-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 367
perf(crypto): CRP-2965 Avoid adding into the identity element during BLS12-381 multiplication #7951
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
randombit
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
jack/crp-2965
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see we have three implementations of
ct_select. One of them does thewrapping_sub(1)internally, the other two don't, so we have to do thewrapping_sub(1)here. I guess this kind of makes sense, because in the former case the table is defined elsewhere, while in the latter the table is part of the same function so we know the table is shifted.However, I wonder if we should aim to have a consistent implementation across all types, if possible. The actual concern I have is related to the use of macros, which makes it a bit hard (for me) to track what types we can instantiate them on. For example, could I have
declare_windowed_scalar_mul_ops_foron an affine type? IIUC this would then use the ct_select with internal wrapping_sub, which may not result in the correct behaviour?WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah that is kind of funky (and the macro proliferation admittedly does not make it easier!), I'll see if I can clean that up