remove_java_new can now follow one typecast

[kroening]

statements such as

var = (type) java_new(....)

can now be lowered. This removes the requirement to introduce a temporary
just to do the typecast.

• Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
• n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
• n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
• Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
• My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
• My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
• n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

[allredj]

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: b6cae86).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/114241513

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (develop@d8598f8). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop    #4747   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   68.44%           
==========================================
  Files              ?     1270           
  Lines              ?   104833           
  Branches           ?        0           
==========================================
  Hits               ?    71758           
  Misses             ?    33075           
  Partials           ?        0

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
jbmc/src/java_bytecode/remove_java_new.cpp	98.41% <100%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d8598f8...b6cae86. Read the comment docs.

[smowton]

Could you add a test, probably examining --show-goto-functions?