new genai rag guide

[Expeto]

Description

Added a new guide about RAG with genAI which also explains how RAG actually work

Reviews

• Technical review
• Editorial review
• Product review

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for docsdocker ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	0c85ca4
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/docsdocker/deploys/67ac4a6571f0180008937356
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-21703--docsdocker.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[dvdksn]

Thank you for your contribution! I appreciate your effort; RAG is an important
topic, and expanding our documentation on it can add significant value for our
readers. However, I think this guide could benefit from more focus and
refinement to align with the needs of our audience and complement our existing
materials. Here are my thoughts:

• The guide's purpose is unclear. It's important to define what this guide
  offers that the existing RAG guide does not. It seems like you want to focus
  on RAG with graph databases and Neo4j in particular. If the goal of the guide
  is to explore and demonstrate the benefits of this technology in particular,
  consider a way of doing that by example. E.g., by comparing this approach to
  using a vector database.
• Th structure and flow of the article feels fragmented and doesn't follow a
  logical progression. For instance, introducing graph databases before RAG
  seems out of place, especially for readers unfamiliar with the primary topic.
  Start with RAG and its benefits, then explain how graph databases fit into
  the picture.
• The "Case Study" section is disconnected from the rest of the content. I
  would suggest removing it. Or if you want to keep it, integrate it into a
  narrative that supports the guide.
• Several sections lack detail and direction. The technical instructions for
  setting up the stack are too sparse to be genuinely useful. I'm missing
  detailed, hands-on workflows and concrete examples that readers can follow
  and apply.

[Expeto]

@dvdksn I did the changes, can you take another look. Thanks.

[craig-osterhout]

Thanks @Expeto.
Added some style suggestions. Overall, it's looking good. The last section is a hard to make sense of, so I suggest elaborating more, or replace it with a summary of what was covered.

[craig-osterhout]

LGTM. The build check now has some errors. Added some suggestions to fix 'em.

[Expeto]

Thanks for the final touch.