Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JIT: Assertion failed '!"Inconsistent profile data"' in System.Text.Json.Tests with random GDV #112196

Open
amanasifkhalid opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #112197
Open
Assignees
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI blocking-clean-ci-optional Blocking optional rolling runs in-pr There is an active PR which will close this issue when it is merged Known Build Error Use this to report build issues in the .NET Helix tab
Milestone

Comments

@amanasifkhalid
Copy link
Member

amanasifkhalid commented Feb 5, 2025

Build Information

Build: https://dev.azure.com/dnceng-public/public/_build/results?buildId=940108&view=results
Build error leg or test failing:

Error Message

Fill the error message using step by step known issues guidance.

{
  "ErrorMessage": "Assertion failed '!\"Inconsistent profile data\"'",
  "BuildRetry": false,
  "ExcludeConsoleLog": false
}

Known issue validation

Build: 🔎 https://dev.azure.com/dnceng-public/public/_build/results?buildId=940108
Error message validated: [Assertion failed '!"Inconsistent profile data"']
Result validation: ✅ Known issue matched with the provided build.
Validation performed at: 2/5/2025 5:32:14 PM UTC

Report

Build Definition Test Pull Request
940108 dotnet/runtime System.Text.Json.Tests.WorkItemExecution #112151

Summary

24-Hour Hit Count 7-Day Hit Count 1-Month Count
1 1 1
@amanasifkhalid amanasifkhalid added area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI blocking-clean-ci-optional Blocking optional rolling runs labels Feb 5, 2025
@amanasifkhalid amanasifkhalid added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Feb 5, 2025
@amanasifkhalid amanasifkhalid self-assigned this Feb 5, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the in-pr There is an active PR which will close this issue when it is merged label Feb 5, 2025
@EgorBo
Copy link
Member

EgorBo commented Feb 5, 2025

@amanasifkhalid FYI CI failures have to reported via https://helix.dot.net/BuildAnalysis/CreateKnownIssues so they can be tracked and mark failures as known in all PRs

@amanasifkhalid
Copy link
Member Author

@amanasifkhalid FYI CI failures have to reported via https://helix.dot.net/BuildAnalysis/CreateKnownIssues so they can be tracked and mark failures as known in all PRs

Thanks for letting me know; I didn't know BA supported outerloop pipelines now. I'll update this issue to conform to it.

@amanasifkhalid amanasifkhalid added the Known Build Error Use this to report build issues in the .NET Helix tab label Feb 5, 2025
@EgorBo
Copy link
Member

EgorBo commented Feb 5, 2025

@amanasifkhalid FYI CI failures have to reported via https://helix.dot.net/BuildAnalysis/CreateKnownIssues so they can be tracked and mark failures as known in all PRs

Thanks for letting me know; I didn't know BA supported outerloop pipelines now. I'll update this issue to conform to it.

I am not sure BA specifically works (I think it doesn't require outerloop failures to be known), but all other things like "hits in 24 hours" should work if I am not mistaken, e.g. #111347

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI blocking-clean-ci-optional Blocking optional rolling runs in-pr There is an active PR which will close this issue when it is merged Known Build Error Use this to report build issues in the .NET Helix tab
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants