Skip to content

Conversation

@drisspg
Copy link
Owner

@drisspg drisspg commented Jan 12, 2026

ignore

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added an ignore pattern to exclude additional AI model output files from version control.
    • Removed the automatic code-review workflow that previously ran on pull requests, stopping those automated review actions from triggering.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

drisspg added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2026
stack-info: PR: #66, branch: drisspg/stack/18
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 12, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Added a single ignore pattern for *.claude and removed the GitHub Actions workflow claude-code-review.yml that previously ran Claude-based PR reviews.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Gitignore Configuration
\.gitignore
Added ignore rule for Claude model output files (*.claude).
CI Workflow Removal
.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml
Deleted the GitHub Actions workflow that triggered Claude code reviews on PR open/synchronize (entire workflow removed).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Poem

🐰 In the burrow I nibble and hum,
A tiny rule—.claude—now gone from the drum.
The watchdog workflow packed up its bag,
Quiet code fields, no automated tag.
Hops of relief, a carrot-sized snag. 🎋

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'ignore' is vague and non-descriptive; it does not clearly convey what specific changes were made to the .gitignore file or why the Claude workflow was deleted. Use a more descriptive title that explains the main purpose, such as 'Add Claude model output to .gitignore and remove claude-code-review workflow' or similar.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bdd1c10 and bb0fb98.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml
  • .gitignore
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: pre-commit (3.10)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.gitignore (1)

2-2: LGTM!

The addition of *.claude to gitignore is appropriate for excluding Claude-related output files from version control. The placement alongside other experiment and data patterns is logical.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

stack-info: PR: #66, branch: drisspg/stack/18
@drisspg drisspg marked this pull request as draft January 12, 2026 23:28
@drisspg drisspg marked this pull request as ready for review January 12, 2026 23:28
@drisspg drisspg merged commit e9fb198 into main Jan 12, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants