Skip to content

[New Rule] Unusual Azure VM Extension Installed; Suspicious Child Process via Azure VM CustomScript Extension#6277

Open
terrancedejesus wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
new-rule/azure-vm-unusual-vm-extension-installed
Open

[New Rule] Unusual Azure VM Extension Installed; Suspicious Child Process via Azure VM CustomScript Extension#6277
terrancedejesus wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
new-rule/azure-vm-unusual-vm-extension-installed

Conversation

@terrancedejesus

@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pull Request

Issue link(s):

Summary - What I changed

Adds detection for extensions installed on Azure VMs that are not native (default) and have never been seen before azure.resource.name in the tenant. Extensions are post-install scripts that execute commands at higher system level privileges. These have historically been abused by adversaries post serial connection to VMs.

Screenshot 2026-06-15 at 3 04 59 PM Screenshot 2026-06-22 at 11 47 16 AM

How To Test

Query can be used in TRADE stack and other telemetry stacks.

Checklist

  • Added a label for the type of pr: bug, enhancement, schema, maintenance, Rule: New, Rule: Deprecation, Rule: Tuning, Hunt: New, or Hunt: Tuning so guidelines can be generated
  • Added the meta:rapid-merge label if planning to merge within 24 hours
  • Secret and sensitive material has been managed correctly
  • Automated testing was updated or added to match the most common scenarios
  • Documentation and comments were added for features that require explanation

Contributor checklist

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rule: New - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when proposing a new rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the rule.
  • List any new fields required in ECS/data sources.
  • Link related issues or PRs.
  • Include references.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • creation_date matches the date of creation PR initially merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive, considering performance for diverse environments. Non ecs fields should be added to non-ecs-schema.json if not available in an integration.
  • min_stack_comments and min_stack_version should be included if the rule is only compatible starting from a specific stack version.
  • index pattern should be neither too specific nor too vague, ensuring it accurately matches the relevant data stream (e.g., use logs-endpoint.process-* for process data).
  • integration should align with the index. If the integration is newly introduced, ensure the manifest, schemas, and new_rule.yaml template are updated.
  • setup should include the necessary steps to configure the integration.
  • note should include any additional information (e.g. Triage and analysis investigation guides, timeline templates).
  • tags should be relevant to the threat and align/added to the EXPECTED_RULE_TAGS in the definitions.py file.
  • threat, techniques, and subtechniques should map to ATT&CK always if possible.

New BBR Rules

  • building_block_type should be included if the rule is a building block and the rule should be located in the rules_building_block folder.
  • bypass_bbr_timing should be included if adding custom lookback timing to the rule.

Testing and Validation

  • Provide evidence of testing and detecting the expected threat.
  • Check for existence of coverage to prevent duplication.

…ibling; adjusts the intent of unusual extension
@tradebot-elastic

tradebot-elastic commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Suspicious Child Process via Azure VM CustomScript Extension (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ Unusual Azure VM Extension Detected (esql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus changed the title [New Rule] Unusual Azure VM Extension Installed [New Rule] Unusual Azure VM Extension Installed; Suspicious Child Process via Azure VM CustomScript Extension Jun 17, 2026
@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2026 17:39
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 17:39
@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus marked this pull request as draft June 17, 2026 17:39
@tradebot-elastic

tradebot-elastic commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Suspicious Child Process via Azure VM CustomScript Extension (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ Unusual Azure VM Extension Detected (esql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds two new detection rules focused on Azure VM extension abuse: one control-plane rule that surfaces first-seen VM extension instance names per host from Azure Activity Logs, and one endpoint rule that detects suspicious process execution associated with the Azure CustomScript extension handler on Windows.

Changes:

  • Adds an ES|QL rule to alert on first-seen (VM, extension instance name) pairs in logs-azure.activitylogs-*.
  • Adds an EQL rule to detect suspicious Windows child process execution tied to CustomScriptHandler.exe.
  • Includes investigation guides and ATT&CK mappings for both rules.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 10 comments.

File Description
rules/windows/execution_azure_customscript_extension_suspicious_descendant.toml New Windows endpoint EQL rule for suspicious process execution associated with Azure CustomScript extension activity.
rules/integrations/azure/execution_azure_vm_extension_unusual_for_host.toml New Azure Activity Logs ES

Comment thread rules/integrations/azure/execution_azure_vm_extension_unusual_for_host.toml Outdated
Comment thread rules/integrations/azure/execution_azure_vm_extension_unusual_for_host.toml Outdated
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@tradebot-elastic

tradebot-elastic commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Suspicious Child Process via Azure VM CustomScript Extension (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ Unusual Azure VM Extension Detected (esql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@tradebot-elastic

tradebot-elastic commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Suspicious Child Process via Azure VM CustomScript Extension (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ Unusual Azure VM Extension Detected (esql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus marked this pull request as ready for review June 22, 2026 15:45
@botelastic botelastic Bot added the OS: Windows windows related rules label Jun 22, 2026
@tradebot-elastic

tradebot-elastic commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Suspicious Child Process via Azure VM CustomScript Extension (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ Unusual Azure VM Extension Detected (esql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants