docs: maven release #2024
docs: maven release #2024
Conversation
jo-elimu
requested review from
nya-elimu,
eymaal and
alexander-kuruvilla
and removed request for
a team
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2024 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 13.05% 13.05%
Complexity 301 301
=========================================
Files 257 257
Lines 7103 7103
Branches 800 800
=========================================
Hits 927 927
Misses 6126 6126
Partials 50 50 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@jo-elimu has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new section in the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
RELEASE.md (4)
3-4: Explicit Reference to Workflow File
The reference to the GitHub Actions workflow file (.github/workflows/maven-release.yml) is direct and useful. Consider adding a brief explanation of what users should expect when they navigate to that file—for example, what aspects of the release process it automates.
8-9: Improve Image Accessibility
The inclusion of the image (intended to illustrate the workflow run) is a great visual aid. However, the markdown image syntax could benefit from more descriptive alternative text to enhance accessibility (e.g.,).
10-16: Clear Instructions for Creating Release Notes
The "Create Release Notes 🗒️" section clearly outlines the steps to generate release notes following a release. The direct URL to the tags page and step-by-step guidance are well presented.
- Suggestion: Include descriptive alt text for the embedded image on line 14 to support accessibility (e.g.,
![Screenshot: Create Release]).
24-45: Informative Footer with Consistent Branding
The footer content embeds essential branding elements and navigational links to the website, Wiki, projects, milestones, community, and support. The centered layout and inclusion of logos enhance the document's professional appearance.
- Suggestion: Ensure that the logo image (line 27) includes proper alternative text for accessibility and consider adding descriptive titles to the links for improved usability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
RELEASE.md(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, 21)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, 17)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, 21)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, 17)
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, 21)
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, 17)
- GitHub Check: test_rest_ENG
- GitHub Check: test_ui_ENG
🔇 Additional comments (3)
RELEASE.md (3)
1-2: Clear Title and Introduction
The document opens with a clear and descriptive title ("How to perform a release 📦"). The introductory lines immediately communicate the purpose of the file.
5-7: Direct Workflow Trigger Instructions
The note block provides clear instructions on how to trigger the release workflow via the Actions page. The URL is explicit, and the call-to-action ("Run workflow") is prominent. This is very user-friendly for someone performing a release.
18-23: Usage Section Provides Artifact Information
The "Usage" section efficiently communicates how users can verify the release artifact, with the inclusion of a JitPack badge and instructions on where the.warfile is uploaded. This section is concise and self-explanatory.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
RELEASE.md (1)
34-55: Branding Footer – Consistent & InformativeThe HTML block for the branding footer is well-crafted and effectively centers the content with logos and links. Note that while HTML in Markdown is acceptable (especially on GitHub), you might consider using Markdown alternatives for broader compatibility if needed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
RELEASE.md(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, 21)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, 17)
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, 21)
- GitHub Check: test_ui_ENG
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, 17)
- GitHub Check: test_rest_ENG
🔇 Additional comments (5)
RELEASE.md (5)
1-3: Header & Workflow Link – Looks GoodThe title and the link to the GitHub Actions workflow (
.github/workflows/maven-release.yml) are clear and appropriately presented.
5-8: Release Workflow Note – Clear InstructionsThe note block providing guidance on how to trigger the release workflow is concise and visually aided by the image. Ensure that the link to the Actions workflow is accurate and accessible.
10-16: Release Notes Section – Clear StepsThe section "### Create release notes 🗒️" outlines the instructions effectively. The steps for accessing tags and generating release notes are clear. Consider adding a brief note for users on any prerequisites if needed.
18-23: Usage Section – Correct & InformativeThe usage section with the JitPack badge and explanation regarding the
.warfile upload is well-structured. Verify that the JitPack configuration remains current with the deployment pipeline.
32-32: Post-Deployment Instructions – Good ClarityThe explanation that the deployment will restart the web server and the instruction to verify the release version in the footer is straightforward and effective.
|
@AshishBagdane I've changed the GitHub settings so that code owners (maintainers) with direct write access to the |
Issue Number
Purpose
Technical Details
Testing Instructions
Screenshots
Format Checks
Note
Files in PRs are automatically checked for format violations with
mvn spotless:check.If this PR contains files with format violations, run
mvn spotless:applyto fix them.