Skip to content

🚀 week-01-environment-setup #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Feb 8, 2025
Merged

🚀 week-01-environment-setup #2

merged 21 commits into from
Feb 8, 2025

Conversation

MahaAmin
Copy link
Collaborator

@MahaAmin MahaAmin commented Jan 4, 2025

First PR Deliverables:

  • Azure Databricks Environment Setup
  • Select dataset Kaggle - Credit Card Fraud Detection Dataset 2023
  • Run python notebooks in databricks cluster for fraud_credit_cards usecase
  • Create "DataProcessor" and "FraudModel" classes
  • Push data.csv to databricks volume
  • Push package.whl to databricks volume
  • Create main.py to preprocess data, train model, and evaluate model
  • Fix pre-commit checks

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Added credit card fraud detection project with machine learning capabilities.
    • Introduced Databricks integration for data processing and model training.
    • Added functionality for connecting to Databricks and retrieving data.
  • Configuration Updates

    • Updated project configuration and dependencies.
    • Added new configuration files for Databricks and project settings.
    • Introduced a new configuration entry for target class.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced README with detailed project description and setup instructions.
    • Added command reference for Databricks CLI.
  • Development Tools

    • Updated pre-commit hooks and CI workflow configuration.
    • Improved project structure and package management.
    • Added commands for installing and configuring Databricks CLI.

@MahaAmin MahaAmin requested a review from a team as a code owner January 4, 2025 22:17
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a comprehensive update to a machine learning project focused on credit card fraud detection. The changes span multiple configuration files, documentation, and source code. The project now includes a structured approach to data processing, model training, and evaluation using Databricks and CatBoost. New modules for data processing and model management have been added, along with configuration files for project settings, Databricks integration, and development workflows.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/CODEOWNERS Added comments clarifying repository ownership rules
.github/workflows/ci.yml Updated dependency installation and pre-commit check steps
.gitignore Added entries for catboost_info/, venv/, and .databricks
.pre-commit-config.yaml Removed ruff hook arguments
README.md Restructured with new project description and setup instructions
config.json New configuration file with {"target": "Class"}
databricks.yml New Databricks asset bundle configuration
main.py Added logging, configuration loading, and model evaluation
notebooks/fraud_credit_cards.py New notebook for credit card fraud detection
notebooks/modular_fraud_credit_cards.py Modular notebook with separate functions for data processing and model evaluation
notes/commands.md Added Databricks CLI commands
project_config.yml Added target class configuration
pyproject.toml Updated project metadata, name, and dependencies
src/fraud_credit_cards/data_processor.py New DataProcessor class for data handling
src/fraud_credit_cards/fraud_model.py New FraudModel class for fraud detection modeling

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant DataProcessor
    participant FraudModel
    participant Databricks

    User->>DataProcessor: Initialize with data path
    DataProcessor->>DataProcessor: Load data
    DataProcessor->>DataProcessor: Preprocess data
    DataProcessor->>FraudModel: Split data
    FraudModel->>FraudModel: Train model
    FraudModel->>FraudModel: Evaluate model
    FraudModel-->>User: Return model performance metrics
Loading

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, through data's maze,
Fraud detection's clever phase,
CatBoost model, sharp and bright,
Catching transactions not quite right!
Machine learning's rabbit trail,
Protecting credit's fragile veil! 🕵️‍♀️


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (16)
dbconnect_example.py (1)

3-3: Avoid embedding profile identifiers directly in code.
It may be preferable to retrieve the profile name or credentials from a secure configuration file or environment variable for maintainability and security.

src/fraud_credit_cards/fraud_model.py (1)

22-42: Evaluation method thoroughly calculates key metrics.

  • This extensive coverage of metrics is beneficial for fraud detection.
  • Consider logging or saving these metrics for further analysis, especially in production ML scenarios.
src/fraud_credit_cards/data_processor.py (2)

16-21: Data loading approach is standard.
Reading CSV via pandas is straightforward. Consider verifying file size or applying chunk-based reading if files grow large.


23-37: Preprocessing logic is modular and flexible.

  • Numeric feature detection is helpful but keep an eye on potential categorical or object columns in real-world data.
  • Good usage of StandardScaler within a pipeline.
main.py (1)

11-27: Functionally rich print_evaluation function.

  • Printing a color-coded classification report is an excellent way to highlight model performance.
  • Consider making thresholds for color-coding configurable if used across different models or classes.
notebooks/fraud_credit_cards.py (3)

44-44: Make dataset path configurable
Currently, the file path "/Volumes/fraud_credit_cards/data/credit_cards_2023/creditcard_2023.csv" is hard-coded. Consider making this path configurable or storing it in a project config to increase portability and maintainability.

- df_tr = pd.read_csv("/Volumes/fraud_credit_cards/data/credit_cards_2023/creditcard_2023.csv")
+ import os
+ filepath = os.getenv("FRAUD_DATA_PATH", "/Volumes/fraud_credit_cards/data/credit_cards_2023/creditcard_2023.csv")
+ df_tr = pd.read_csv(filepath)

75-75: Check random state usage for reproducibility
You’re using random_state=42 in the train/test split. This is a fine convention for reproducibility, but ensure that it aligns with team standards or best practices for your project.


87-101: Enhance classification report for imbalanced data
Using a color-coded classification report is helpful, but consider advanced metrics like ROC AUC or PR curves if your dataset is imbalanced. Also consider logging or saving metrics for more detailed historical analysis.

notebooks/modular_fraud_credit_cards.py (2)

74-89: Consider returning the numeric feature list for debugging
You are listing numeric features and building the ColumnTransformer, but it may be useful to store or return these columns for logging or debugging.


143-144: Correct minor typographical error
The word “Calcualte” is misspelled. It’s good practice to ensure clarity and correctness in docstrings and code comments.

-    # Calcualte F1 score
+    # Calculate F1 score
pyproject.toml (2)

7-23: Check newly added dependencies for synergy
Adding catboost, colorama, and other packages is fine, but confirm no conflict with existing dependencies (e.g., scikit-learn).


45-45: Maintain consistency in indentation rules
You’ve specified "indent-style": "space". If your notebook cells mix tabs and spaces, it could cause formatting issues. Consider adding a pre-commit hook or a consistent code formatter to enforce rules.

README.md (3)

24-34: Environment setup instructions need enhancement

While the UV usage is well documented, consider adding:

  1. A note about required UV version
  2. Error handling steps for common installation issues
  3. Verification steps to confirm successful setup
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

27-27: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading

(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)


25-25: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


29-29: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


38-50: Add language specifiers to code blocks

The code blocks need language specifiers for better syntax highlighting and documentation clarity.

Update the code blocks like this:

-```
+```bash
uv build

<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>

<details>
<summary>🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)</summary>

38-38: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

---

44-44: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

---

48-48: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

</details>

</details>

---

`52-58`: **Add pre-commit configuration details**

The pre-commit section should include:
1. Information about which checks are being run
2. How to handle common pre-commit failures

<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>

<details>
<summary>🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)</summary>

56-56: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

</details>

</details>

</blockquote></details>
<details>
<summary>notes/commands.md (1)</summary><blockquote>

`1-3`: **Fix heading hierarchy**

The heading levels should increment by one level at a time. Change "Commands" to use H2 level:

```diff
-# Commands
+## Commands
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

3-3: Expected: h2; Actual: h3
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time

(MD001, heading-increment)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 35f0af0 and 8c5c716.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • uv.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
  • .gitignore (3 hunks)
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml (0 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • config.json (1 hunks)
  • databricks.yml (1 hunks)
  • dbconnect_example.py (1 hunks)
  • main.py (1 hunks)
  • notebooks/fraud_credit_cards.py (1 hunks)
  • notebooks/modular_fraud_credit_cards.py (1 hunks)
  • notes/commands.md (1 hunks)
  • project_config.yml (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (2 hunks)
  • src/fraud_credit_cards/data_processor.py (1 hunks)
  • src/fraud_credit_cards/fraud_model.py (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • config.json
  • .github/CODEOWNERS
  • project_config.yml
  • databricks.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
README.md

27-27: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading

(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)


25-25: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


29-29: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


38-38: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


44-44: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


48-48: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


56-56: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

notes/commands.md

3-3: Expected: h2; Actual: h3
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time

(MD001, heading-increment)


5-5: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


13-13: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


19-19: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


25-25: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

🔇 Additional comments (23)
dbconnect_example.py (2)

1-1: Databricks Connect import looks fine.
No issues seen with this import statement.


4-5: Data read and display from table is straightforward.
Everything here appears correct, and this snippet demonstrates a successful Spark read operation with a quick preview.

src/fraud_credit_cards/fraud_model.py (3)

13-14: Initialize CatBoost within a Pipeline.
Initializing CatBoost with verbose=False is a good choice to keep logs clean during training. Optionally, consider specifying a random seed or other hyperparameters for reproducibility.


16-18: Training method is concise and clear.
The train method fits the pipeline on the provided data. No obvious issues. Ensure that hyperparameters for CatBoost are finalized or loaded from config if needed.


19-20: Predict method is correct and aligns well with Pipeline usage.
No changes required. It's straightforward and properly returns predictions.

src/fraud_credit_cards/data_processor.py (2)

8-15: DataProcessor initialization is well-structured.

  • The config-based approach is good for dynamic usage.
  • You may want to handle exceptions if the data file is missing or corrupt.

38-40: Data splitting is standard.
The train_test_split usage is appropriate and configurable for test size and random state.

main.py (8)

1-2: Logging setup is appropriate.
No issues seen in the initialization.


3-6: Imports appear valid for the intended functionality.
They align with the usage in this file without obvious redundancy.


29-32: Centralized logging configuration.
Defining a specific format and logger is good for consistency.


33-39: Config loading with YAML is correct.
YAML file loading is appropriate; printing the config is handy. Ensure no sensitive data is exposed in logs.


40-47: DataProcessor usage integrates well.

  • The code flow is clear, from instantiation to data preprocessing.
  • Confirm data paths match actual environment directories.

48-52: Split data is correctly handled and logged.
Detailed logging of shapes helps debug data flow problems. Looks good.


53-57: Model initialization and training is straightforward.
No issues; logging indicates when training completes.


58-63: Evaluation is comprehensive and clearly orchestrated.
Properly outputs metrics via the print_evaluation function.

notebooks/fraud_credit_cards.py (1)

14-14: Verify pinned package versions
Pinning the package versions is generally good practice for reproducibility. However, ensure these specific versions (colorama==0.4.6, catboost==1.2.0, and gecs==0.1.1) are secure and compatible with your environment.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the other packages.


Let's check the content of pyproject.toml to see if there are any version constraints or dependencies defined there.


Let's check how these packages are being used in the codebase to understand their importance.


Pinned package versions are secure and properly used
The specified versions (colorama==0.4.6, catboost==1.2.0, and gecs==0.1.1) are:

  • Defined in pyproject.toml as direct dependencies
  • No security vulnerabilities found for colorama and catboost
  • Used consistently across the codebase:
    • catboost: Used for the CatBoostClassifier in the fraud detection model
    • colorama: Used for colored console output in classification reports
    • gecs: Though installed, not directly used in the visible code (might be a transitive dependency)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify no known security or compatibility issues with pinned packages
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: PIP, package: "catboost") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}
'

Length of output: 342


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for security vulnerabilities in colorama and gecs
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: PIP, package: "colorama") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}
'

# Let's also check if these packages are mentioned in requirements.txt or similar files
fd -e txt -e ini -e cfg -e yaml -e yml -e toml | xargs rg -l "colorama|catboost|gecs"

Length of output: 444


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of pyproject.toml
cat pyproject.toml

# Also let's check if these packages are used in the codebase
rg -l "colorama|catboost|gecs" --type py

Length of output: 1202


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check how these packages are used in the files
rg "colorama|catboost|gecs" -A 2 -B 2 src/fraud_credit_cards/fraud_model.py notebooks/modular_fraud_credit_cards.py notebooks/fraud_credit_cards.py main.py

Length of output: 2291

notebooks/modular_fraud_credit_cards.py (1)

14-14: Validate pinned package versions
As with the other notebook, verify that these pinned versions are secure and still appropriate for the project’s current needs.

✅ Verification successful

Package versions are consistently used and properly integrated

The verification shows that:

  • colorama 0.4.6 is actively used for colored output in the codebase and is consistently pinned across notebooks and pyproject.toml
  • catboost 1.2.0 is used for the core ML model functionality and is properly referenced
  • gecs 0.1.1 is consistently defined in dependencies

All package versions are:

  • Consistently defined across the project
  • Actively used in the codebase
  • Properly integrated in the project's dependency management
  • Recent enough to be considered secure (colorama 0.4.6 is the latest stable version, catboost 1.2.0 is a recent release)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Checking for known vulnerabilities for colorama
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: PIP, package: "colorama") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}
'
'

Length of output: 459


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for package versions in other notebooks and requirements files
fd -e txt -e py -e ipynb -e yaml -e yml -e toml -e ini . -x rg -l "colorama|catboost|gecs"

# Check if there are any requirements files
fd "requirements" -e txt -e yaml -e yml -e toml -e ini

# Look for version specifications in notebooks
rg "colorama==" 
rg "catboost==" 
rg "gecs=="

Length of output: 1050


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how these packages are used in the codebase
rg "colorama" -A 2 -B 2
rg "catboost" -A 2 -B 2
rg "gecs" -A 2 -B 2

# Let's also check the content of pyproject.toml for any additional context
cat pyproject.toml

Length of output: 11862

.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)

21-21: Confirm uv sync installs all needed dependencies
Ensure that uv sync pulls in the same dependencies as your local environment. If the workflow environment is missing any local packages, this may cause build inconsistencies.


25-26: Validate successful pre-commit installation and run
Installing pre-commit within the same step is good, but verify that this approach covers all hooks needed for your project (e.g., linting, formatting).

pyproject.toml (2)

2-4: Project metadata updates look good
Renaming the project to “fraud_credit_cards” and updating the description help clarify your repository’s intention.


6-6: Expand Python version range with caution
Your Python version is now >=3.11, <3.12. Verify that all dependencies are compatible with future releases within that window.

.gitignore (1)

13-14: LGTM! Appropriate entries for ML project

The added entries appropriately exclude:

  • ML artifacts (catboost_info/)
  • Virtual environment (venv/)
  • Databricks configuration (.databricks)
  • Data directory (data/)

These align well with the project's focus on ML using CatBoost and Databricks.

Also applies to: 34-34, 100-101

README.md (1)

4-20: Project description needs clarification

The project description and deliverables are clear, but there's a discrepancy between the dataset path in the code (house_prices/data/data.csv) and the mentioned Credit Card Fraud Detection dataset.

Please clarify if this is the correct dataset path and update either the code or documentation accordingly.

Comment on lines 53 to 59
def load_data(path):
"""
Load the data from the given filepath.
"""
df = pd.read_csv(filepath)
return df

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix variable name mismatch
Inside load_data(path), the CSV read is using filepath instead of path. This will cause a NameError since filepath is not defined in the function scope.

def load_data(path):
    """
    Load the data from the given filepath.
    """
-    df = pd.read_csv(filepath)
+    df = pd.read_csv(path)
    return df
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
def load_data(path):
"""
Load the data from the given filepath.
"""
df = pd.read_csv(filepath)
return df
def load_data(path):
"""
Load the data from the given filepath.
"""
df = pd.read_csv(path)
return df

Comment on lines +11 to +15
### Initiate Authenticaton

```
databricks auth login --configure-cluster --host <workspace-url>
```
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add security best practices for authentication

The authentication section should include:

  1. Instructions for secure credential management
  2. Warning about not committing workspace URLs
  3. Explanation of the <workspace-url> placeholder format
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

13-13: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
notebooks/modular_fraud_credit_cards.py (4)

42-43: Reconsider broad warning suppression.

Blanket warning suppression might hide important issues. Consider:

  1. Using more specific warning filters
  2. Addressing the root cause of warnings
  3. At minimum, document why these warnings are suppressed
-warnings.filterwarnings("ignore", category=FutureWarning)
-warnings.filterwarnings("ignore")
+# TODO: Document specific warnings being suppressed
+warnings.filterwarnings("ignore", category=FutureWarning, message="specific_message")

61-61: Avoid hardcoding the data filepath.

Consider making the filepath configurable through environment variables or a config file for better flexibility and maintainability.

-filepath = "/Volumes/fraud_credit_cards/data/credit_cards_2023/creditcard_2023.csv"
+# Use environment variable or config file
+filepath = os.getenv('CREDIT_CARD_DATA_PATH', '/Volumes/fraud_credit_cards/data/credit_cards_2023/creditcard_2023.csv')

153-153: Remove redundant import.

The Back import from colorama is already available from the earlier imports section.

-    from colorama import Back

129-169: Enhance model evaluation.

Consider these improvements:

  1. Make the performance thresholds configurable
  2. Add confusion matrix visualization
  3. Add ROC curve and AUC score for better evaluation of binary classification

Here's a suggested enhancement:

 def evaluate_model(model, X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test, y_pred):
+    # Add configuration for thresholds
+    PERFORMANCE_THRESHOLDS = {
+        'precision': 0.8,
+        'recall': 0.8,
+        'f1': 0.8
+    }
+
     # Generate evaluation metrics
     accuracy = accuracy_score(y_test, y_pred)
     precision = precision_score(y_test, y_pred)
     recall = recall_score(y_test, y_pred)
     mse = mean_squared_error(y_test, y_pred)
     f1 = f1_score(y_test, y_pred)
+
+    # Add ROC curve and AUC score
+    fpr, tpr, _ = roc_curve(y_test, model.predict_proba(X_test)[:, 1])
+    auc_score = auc(fpr, tpr)
+    print(f"AUC Score: {auc_score:.3f}")
+
+    # Add confusion matrix
+    cm = confusion_matrix(y_test, y_pred)
+    print("\nConfusion Matrix:")
+    print(cm)

     # Display classification report with colors
     print("\n" + Back.BLUE + Fore.WHITE + "Classification Report" + Style.RESET_ALL)
     report = classification_report(y_test, y_pred, output_dict=True)
     for key, value in report.items():
         if key in ["0", "1"]:
-            color = Fore.GREEN if value["precision"] > 0.8 else Fore.RED
+            color = Fore.GREEN if value["precision"] > PERFORMANCE_THRESHOLDS['precision'] else Fore.RED
             print(f"Class {key}:")
             print(f"  Precision: {color}{value['precision']:.2f}{Style.RESET_ALL}")
-            color = Fore.GREEN if value["recall"] > 0.8 else Fore.RED
+            color = Fore.GREEN if value["recall"] > PERFORMANCE_THRESHOLDS['recall'] else Fore.RED
             print(f"  Recall: {color}{value['recall']:.2f}{Style.RESET_ALL}")
-            color = Fore.GREEN if value["f1-score"] > 0.8 else Fore.RED
+            color = Fore.GREEN if value["f1-score"] > PERFORMANCE_THRESHOLDS['f1'] else Fore.RED
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8c5c716 and a6d09ca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • notebooks/modular_fraud_credit_cards.py (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +74 to +89
def preprocess_data(df, target_column="Class"):
# Spliting the data into features and target
X = df.drop(target_column, axis=1)
y = df[target_column]

# Define numeric features (remove categorical columns)
numeric_features = X.select_dtypes(include=["int64", "float64"]).columns.tolist()

# Define preprocessing steps
numeric_transformer = Pipeline(steps=[("scaler", StandardScaler())])

preprocessor = ColumnTransformer(transformers=[("num", numeric_transformer, numeric_features)])

print("Features Shape: ", X.shape)
print("Target Shape: ", y.shape)
return X, y, preprocessor
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance data preprocessing robustness.

The preprocessing could be improved by:

  1. Adding input validation
  2. Handling missing values
  3. Detecting and handling outliers
  4. Making numeric feature detection more flexible

Here's a suggested enhancement:

 def preprocess_data(df, target_column="Class"):
+    # Validate inputs
+    if not isinstance(df, pd.DataFrame):
+        raise TypeError("Input must be a pandas DataFrame")
+    if target_column not in df.columns:
+        raise ValueError(f"Target column '{target_column}' not found in DataFrame")
+
+    # Check for missing values
+    if df.isnull().any().any():
+        print("Warning: Dataset contains missing values")
+        # Handle missing values based on your strategy
+        df = df.fillna(df.mean())
+
     # Spliting the data into features and target
     X = df.drop(target_column, axis=1)
     y = df[target_column]
 
-    # Define numeric features (remove categorical columns)
-    numeric_features = X.select_dtypes(include=["int64", "float64"]).columns.tolist()
+    # More flexible numeric feature detection
+    numeric_features = X.select_dtypes(include=np.number).columns.tolist()
 
     # Define preprocessing steps
-    numeric_transformer = Pipeline(steps=[("scaler", StandardScaler())])
+    numeric_transformer = Pipeline(steps=[
+        ("outlier_handler", RobustScaler()),  # Handle outliers
+        ("scaler", StandardScaler())
+    ])

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +102 to +115
def train_and_evaluate_model(X, y, preprocessor, test_size=0.2, random_state=42, n_estimators=100):
# Define the model
model = Pipeline(steps=[("preprocessor", preprocessor), ("classifier", CatBoostClassifier(verbose=False))])

# Split the data into training and test sets
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=test_size, random_state=random_state)

# Fit the model
model.fit(X_train, y_train)

# Predict on the test set
y_pred = model.predict(X_test)

return model, X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test, y_pred
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve model training robustness.

Consider these enhancements:

  1. The n_estimators parameter is defined but not used
  2. No cross-validation for more reliable performance estimation
  3. No hyperparameter tuning

Here's a suggested enhancement:

 def train_and_evaluate_model(X, y, preprocessor, test_size=0.2, random_state=42, n_estimators=100):
     # Define the model
-    model = Pipeline(steps=[("preprocessor", preprocessor), ("classifier", CatBoostClassifier(verbose=False))])
+    model = Pipeline(steps=[
+        ("preprocessor", preprocessor),
+        ("classifier", CatBoostClassifier(
+            n_estimators=n_estimators,
+            verbose=False
+        ))
+    ])
+
+    # Use cross-validation for more reliable evaluation
+    cv_scores = cross_val_score(model, X, y, cv=5)
+    print(f"Cross-validation scores: {cv_scores}")
+    print(f"Mean CV score: {cv_scores.mean():.3f} (+/- {cv_scores.std() * 2:.3f})")

     # Split the data into training and test sets
     X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=test_size, random_state=random_state)

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.


# COMMAND ----------

# MAGIC %pip install colorama==0.4.6 catboost==1.2.0 gecs==0.1.1
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Update package versions and remove unused gecs package

Based on the verification:

  1. colorama==0.4.6 is the latest version and has no security advisories, so it's fine.
  2. catboost==1.2.0 is outdated (latest is 1.2.7), should be updated.
  3. gecs==0.1.1 is installed but not used anywhere in the notebook. The code only uses colorama and catboost for fraud detection implementation.

Recommendations:

  • Update catboost to the latest version: catboost==1.2.7
  • Remove the unused gecs package as it's not required for the functionality
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify package versions and clarify gecs usage.

Please verify:

  1. Are these the latest stable versions compatible with your environment?
  2. What is the purpose of the gecs package in this project?

Run this script to check latest versions:


Let me search for the usage of gecs in the codebase to understand its purpose before making the final recommendation.


Let me try searching without the file type filter since it's not recognized.


Let me check the content of these files to understand how gecs is being used.


Let me check the content of the notebook file specifically.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest versions of required packages

# Check PyPI for latest versions
for package in colorama catboost gecs; do
  echo "Latest version of $package:"
  curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/$package/json" | jq -r '.info.version'
done

# Check for any security advisories
for package in colorama catboost gecs; do
  echo "Security advisories for $package:"
  gh api graphql -f query="{
    securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: PIP, package: \"$package\") {
      nodes {
        advisory {
          summary
          severity
          publishedAt
        }
        vulnerableVersionRange
      }
    }
  }"
done

Length of output: 1785


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for gecs usage in the codebase
rg -l "gecs" --type python

# Search for any imports or usage patterns of gecs
rg "from gecs|import gecs|gecs\." --type python -A 2

Length of output: 143


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for gecs usage in the codebase
rg -l "gecs"

# Search for any imports or usage patterns of gecs
rg "from gecs|import gecs|gecs\." -A 2

Length of output: 148


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of relevant files
echo "=== Content of pyproject.toml ==="
cat pyproject.toml

echo -e "\n=== Content of uv.lock ==="
cat uv.lock

echo -e "\n=== Content of notebooks/fraud_credit_cards.py ==="
cat notebooks/fraud_credit_cards.py

Length of output: 66870


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of the notebook file
cat notebooks/modular_fraud_credit_cards.py

Length of output: 4751

Copy link

@basakeskili basakeskili left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job!

@MahaAmin MahaAmin merged commit c6fc761 into main Feb 8, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants