[CI only]Aggressive crash test value #10761
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@hx235 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
This was referenced Oct 5, 2022
facebook-github-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2022
…nos between ingested files and memtable's (#10777) Summary: **Context:** Same as #5958 (comment) but apply the fix to FIFO Compaction case Repro: ``` COERCE_CONTEXT_SWICH=1 make -j56 db_stress ./db_stress --acquire_snapshot_one_in=0 --adaptive_readahead=0 --allow_data_in_errors=True --async_io=1 --avoid_flush_during_recovery=0 --avoid_unnecessary_blocking_io=0 --backup_max_size=104857600 --backup_one_in=0 --batch_protection_bytes_per_key=0 --block_size=16384 --bloom_bits=18 --bottommost_compression_type=disable --bytes_per_sync=262144 --cache_index_and_filter_blocks=0 --cache_size=8388608 --cache_type=lru_cache --charge_compression_dictionary_building_buffer=0 --charge_file_metadata=1 --charge_filter_construction=1 --charge_table_reader=1 --checkpoint_one_in=0 --checksum_type=kCRC32c --clear_column_family_one_in=0 --column_families=1 --compact_files_one_in=0 --compact_range_one_in=1000 --compaction_pri=3 --open_files=-1 --compaction_style=2 --fifo_allow_compaction=1 --compaction_ttl=0 --compression_max_dict_buffer_bytes=8388607 --compression_max_dict_bytes=16384 --compression_parallel_threads=1 --compression_type=zlib --compression_use_zstd_dict_trainer=1 --compression_zstd_max_train_bytes=0 --continuous_verification_interval=0 --data_block_index_type=0 --db=/dev/shm/rocksdb_test0/rocksdb_crashtest_whitebox --db_write_buffer_size=8388608 --delpercent=4 --delrangepercent=1 --destroy_db_initially=1 --detect_filter_construct_corruption=0 --disable_wal=0 --enable_compaction_filter=0 --enable_pipelined_write=1 --fail_if_options_file_error=1 --file_checksum_impl=none --flush_one_in=1000 --format_version=5 --get_current_wal_file_one_in=0 --get_live_files_one_in=0 --get_property_one_in=0 --get_sorted_wal_files_one_in=0 --index_block_restart_interval=15 --index_type=3 --ingest_external_file_one_in=100 --initial_auto_readahead_size=0 --iterpercent=10 --key_len_percent_dist=1,30,69 --level_compaction_dynamic_level_bytes=True --log2_keys_per_lock=10 --long_running_snapshots=0 --mark_for_compaction_one_file_in=10 --max_auto_readahead_size=16384 --max_background_compactions=20 --max_bytes_for_level_base=10485760 --max_key=100000 --max_key_len=3 --max_manifest_file_size=1073741824 --max_write_batch_group_size_bytes=1048576 --max_write_buffer_number=3 --max_write_buffer_size_to_maintain=4194304 --memtable_prefix_bloom_size_ratio=0.5 --memtable_protection_bytes_per_key=1 --memtable_whole_key_filtering=1 --memtablerep=skip_list --mmap_read=1 --mock_direct_io=False --nooverwritepercent=1 --num_file_reads_for_auto_readahead=0 --num_levels=1 --open_metadata_write_fault_one_in=0 --open_read_fault_one_in=32 --open_write_fault_one_in=0 --ops_per_thread=200000 --optimize_filters_for_memory=0 --paranoid_file_checks=1 --partition_filters=0 --partition_pinning=1 --pause_background_one_in=0 --periodic_compaction_seconds=0 --prefix_size=8 --prefixpercent=5 --prepopulate_block_cache=0 --progress_reports=0 --read_fault_one_in=0 --readahead_size=16384 --readpercent=45 --recycle_log_file_num=1 --reopen=20 --ribbon_starting_level=999 --snapshot_hold_ops=1000 --sst_file_manager_bytes_per_sec=0 --sst_file_manager_bytes_per_truncate=0 --subcompactions=2 --sync=0 --sync_fault_injection=0 --target_file_size_base=524288 --target_file_size_multiplier=2 --test_batches_snapshots=0 --top_level_index_pinning=3 --unpartitioned_pinning=0 --use_direct_io_for_flush_and_compaction=0 --use_direct_reads=0 --use_full_merge_v1=1 --use_merge=0 --use_multiget=1 --user_timestamp_size=0 --value_size_mult=32 --verify_checksum=1 --verify_checksum_one_in=0 --verify_db_one_in=1000 --verify_sst_unique_id_in_manifest=1 --wal_bytes_per_sync=0 --wal_compression=zstd --write_buffer_size=524288 --write_dbid_to_manifest=0 --writepercent=35 put or merge error: Corruption: force_consistency_checks(DEBUG): VersionBuilder: L0 file #479 with seqno 23711 29070 vs. file #482 with seqno 27138 29049 ``` **Summary:** FIFO only does intra-L0 compaction in the following four cases. For other cases, FIFO drops data instead of compacting on data, which is irrelevant to the overlapping seqno issue we are solving. - [FIFOCompactionPicker::PickSizeCompaction](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.6.fb/db/compaction/compaction_picker_fifo.cc#L155) when `total size < compaction_options_fifo.max_table_files_size` and `compaction_options_fifo.allow_compaction == true` - For this path, we simply reuse the fix in `FindIntraL0Compaction` https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5958/files#diff-c261f77d6dd2134333c4a955c311cf4a196a08d3c2bb6ce24fd6801407877c89R56 - This path was not stress-tested at all. Therefore we covered `fifo.allow_compaction` in stress test to surface the overlapping seqno issue we are fixing here. - [FIFOCompactionPicker::PickCompactionToWarm](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.6.fb/db/compaction/compaction_picker_fifo.cc#L313) when `compaction_options_fifo.age_for_warm > 0` - For this path, we simply replicate the idea in #5958 (comment) and skip files of largest seqno greater than `earliest_mem_seqno` - This path was not stress-tested at all. However covering `age_for_warm` option worths a separate PR to deal with db stress compatibility. Therefore we manually tested this path for this PR - [FIFOCompactionPicker::CompactRange](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.6.fb/db/compaction/compaction_picker_fifo.cc#L365) that ends up picking one of the above two compactions - [CompactionPicker::CompactFiles](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.6.fb/db/compaction/compaction_picker.cc#L378) - Since `SanitizeCompactionInputFiles()` will be called [before](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.6.fb/db/compaction/compaction_picker.h#L111-L113) `CompactionPicker::CompactFiles` , we simply replicate the idea in #5958 (comment) in `SanitizeCompactionInputFiles()`. To simplify implementation, we return `Stats::Abort()` on encountering seqno-overlapped file when doing compaction to L0 instead of skipping the file and proceed with the compaction. Some additional clean-up included in this PR: - Renamed `earliest_memtable_seqno` to `earliest_mem_seqno` for consistent naming - Added comment about `earliest_memtable_seqno` in related APIs - Made parameter `earliest_memtable_seqno` constant and required Pull Request resolved: #10777 Test Plan: - make check - New unit test `TEST_P(DBCompactionTestFIFOCheckConsistencyWithParam, FlushAfterIntraL0CompactionWithIngestedFile)`corresponding to the above 4 cases, which will fail accordingly without the fix - Regular CI stress run on this PR + stress test with aggressive value #10761 and on FIFO compaction only Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D40090485 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 52624186952ee7109117788741aeeac86b624a4f
hx235
force-pushed
the
aggres_stress_val
branch
from
783b9a5 to
f00b66e
Compare
|
@hx235 has updated the pull request. You must reimport the pull request before landing. |
|
@hx235 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
facebook-github-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2022
…rd from prev manifest (#10892) Summary: **Context** `Options::track_and_verify_wals_in_manifest = true` verifies each of the WALs tracked in manifest indeed presents in the WAL folder. If not, a corruption "Missing WAL with log number" will be thrown. `DB::SyncWAL()` called at a specific timing (i.e, at the `TEST_SYNC_POINT("FindObsoleteFiles::PostMutexUnlock")`) can record in a new manifest the WAL addition of a WAL file that already had a WAL deletion recorded in the previous manifest. And the WAL deletion record is not rollover-ed to the new manifest. So the new manifest creates the illusion of such WAL never gets deleted and should presents at db re/open. - Such WAL deletion record can be caused by flushing the memtable associated with that WAL and such WAL deletion can actually happen in` PurgeObsoleteFiles()`. As a consequence, upon `DB::Reopen()`, this WAL file can be deleted while manifest still has its WAL addition record , which causes a false alarm of corruption "Missing WAL with log number" to be thrown. **Summary** This PR fixes this false alarm by rolling over the WAL deletion record from prev manifest to the new manifest by adding the WAL deletion record to the new manifest. **Test** - Make check - Added new unit test `TEST_F(DBWALTest, FixSyncWalOnObseletedWalWithNewManifestCausingMissingWAL)` that failed before the fix and passed after - [Ongoing]CI stress test + aggressive value as in #10761 , which is how this false alarm was first surfaced, to confirm such false alarm disappears - [Ongoing]Regular CI stress test to confirm such fix didn't harm anything Pull Request resolved: #10892 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D40778965 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: a512364bfdeb0b1a55c171890e60d856c528f37f
facebook-github-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2022
Summary:
**Context:**
Sorting L0 files by `largest_seqno` has at least two inconvenience:
- File ingestion and compaction involving ingested files can create files of overlapping seqno range with the existing files. `force_consistency_check=true` will catch such overlap seqno range even those harmless overlap.
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n")
- insert k1@1 to memtable m1
- ingest file s1 with k2@2, ingest file s2 with k3@3
- insert k4@4 to m1
- compact files s1, s2 and result in new file s3 of seqno range [2, 3]
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [1, 4]. And `force_consistency_check=true` will think s4 and s3 has file reordering corruption that might cause retuning an old value of k1
- However such caught corruption is a false positive since s1, s2 will not have overlapped keys with k1 or whatever inserted into m1 before ingest file s1 by the requirement of file ingestion (otherwise the m1 will be flushed first before any of the file ingestion completes). Therefore there in fact isn't any file reordering corruption.
- Single delete can decrease a file's largest seqno and ordering by `largest_seqno` can introduce a wrong ordering hence file reordering corruption
- For example, consider the following sequence of events ("key@n" indicates key at seqno "n", Credit to ajkr for this example)
- an existing SST s1 contains only k1@1
- insert k1@2 to memtable m1
- ingest file s2 with k3@3, ingest file s3 with k4@4
- insert single delete k5@5 in m1
- flush m1 and result in new file s4 of seqno range [2, 5]
- compact s1, s2, s3 and result in new file s5 of seqno range [1, 4]
- compact s4 and result in new file s6 of seqno range [2] due to single delete
- By the last step, we have file ordering by largest seqno (">" means "newer") : s5 > s6 while s6 contains a newer version of the k1's value (i.e, k1@2) than s5, which is a real reordering corruption. While this can be caught by `force_consistency_check=true`, there isn't a good way to prevent this from happening if ordering by `largest_seqno`
Therefore, we are redesigning the sorting criteria of L0 files and avoid above inconvenience. Credit to ajkr , we now introduce `epoch_num` which describes the order of a file being flushed or ingested/imported (compaction output file will has the minimum `epoch_num` among input files'). This will avoid the above inconvenience in the following ways:
- In the first case above, there will no longer be overlap seqno range check in `force_consistency_check=true` but `epoch_number` ordering check. This will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s4 (pre-compaction) and s3 < s4 (post-compaction) which won't trigger false positive corruption. See test class `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*` for more.
- In the second case above, this will result in file ordering s1 < s2 < s3 < s4 (pre-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s4 (post-compacting s1, s2, s3), s5 < s6 (post-compacting s4), which are correct file ordering without causing any corruption.
**Summary:**
- Introduce `epoch_number` stored per `ColumnFamilyData` and sort CF's L0 files by their assigned `epoch_number` instead of `largest_seqno`.
- `epoch_number` is increased and assigned upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` for flush (or similarly for WriteLevel0TableForRecovery) and file ingestion (except for allow_behind_true, which will always get assigned as the `kReservedEpochNumberForFileIngestedBehind`)
- Compaction output file is assigned with the minimum `epoch_number` among input files'
- Refit level: reuse refitted file's epoch_number
- Other paths needing `epoch_number` treatment:
- Import column families: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`
- Repair: reuse file's epoch_number if exists. If not, assign one based on `NewestFirstBySeqNo`.
- Assigning new epoch_number to a file and adding this file to LSM tree should be atomic. This is guaranteed by us assigning epoch_number right upon `VersionEdit::AddFile()` where this version edit will be apply to LSM tree shape right after by holding the db mutex (e.g, flush, file ingestion, import column family) or by there is only 1 ongoing edit per CF (e.g, WriteLevel0TableForRecovery, Repair).
- Assigning the minimum input epoch number to compaction output file won't misorder L0 files (even through later `Refit(target_level=0)`). It's due to for every key "k" in the input range, a legit compaction will cover a continuous epoch number range of that key. As long as we assign the key "k" the minimum input epoch number, it won't become newer or older than the versions of this key that aren't included in this compaction hence no misorder.
- Persist `epoch_number` of each file in manifest and recover `epoch_number` on db recovery
- Backward compatibility with old db without `epoch_number` support is guaranteed by assigning `epoch_number` to recovered files by `NewestFirstBySeqno` order. See `VersionStorageInfo::RecoverEpochNumbers()` for more
- Forward compatibility with manifest is guaranteed by flexibility of `NewFileCustomTag`
- Replace `force_consistent_check` on L0 with `epoch_number` and remove false positive check like case 1 with `largest_seqno` above
- Due to backward compatibility issue, we might encounter files with missing epoch number at the beginning of db recovery. We will still use old L0 sorting mechanism (`NewestFirstBySeqno`) to check/sort them till we infer their epoch number. See usages of `EpochNumberRequirement`.
- Remove fix #5958 (comment) and their outdated tests to file reordering corruption because such fix can be replaced by this PR.
- Misc:
- update existing tests with `epoch_number` so make check will pass
- update #5958 (comment) tests to verify corruption is fixed using `epoch_number` and cover universal/fifo compaction/CompactRange/CompactFile cases
- assert db_mutex is held for a few places before calling ColumnFamilyData::NewEpochNumber()
Pull Request resolved: #10922
Test Plan:
- `make check`
- New unit tests under `db/db_compaction_test.cc`, `db/db_test2.cc`, `db/version_builder_test.cc`, `db/repair_test.cc`
- Updated tests (i.e, `DBCompactionTestL0FilesMisorderCorruption*`) under #5958 (comment)
- [Ongoing] Compatibility test: manually run ajkr@36a5686 (with file ingestion off for running the `.orig` binary to prevent this bug affecting upgrade/downgrade formality checking) for 1 hour on `simple black/white box`, `cf_consistency/txn/enable_ts with whitebox + test_best_efforts_recovery with blackbox`
- [Ongoing] normal db stress test
- [Ongoing] db stress test with aggressive value #10761
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D41063187
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 826cb23455de7beaabe2d16c57682a82733a32a9
facebook-github-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 29, 2022
…l() (#10988) Summary: **Context:** File ingestion never checks whether the key range it acts on overlaps with an ongoing RefitLevel() (used in `CompactRange()` with `change_level=true`). That's because RefitLevel() doesn't register and make its key range known to file ingestion. Though it checks overlapping with other compactions by https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.8.fb/db/external_sst_file_ingestion_job.cc#L998. RefitLevel() (used in `CompactRange()` with `change_level=true`) doesn't check whether the key range it acts on overlaps with an ongoing file ingestion. That's because file ingestion does not register and make its key range known to other compactions. - Note that non-refitlevel-compaction (e.g, manual compaction w/o RefitLevel() or general compaction) also does not check key range overlap with ongoing file ingestion for the same reason. - But it's fine. Credited to cbi42's discovery, `WaitForIngestFile` was called by background and foreground compactions. They were introduced in 0f88160, 5c64fb6 and 87dfc1d. - Regardless, this PR registers file ingestion like a compaction is a general approach that will also add range conflict check between file ingestion and non-refitlevel-compaction, though it has not been the issue motivated this PR. Above are bugs resulting in two bad consequences: - If file ingestion and RefitLevel() creates files in the same level, then range-overlapped files will be created at that level and caught as corruption by `force_consistency_checks=true` - If file ingestion and RefitLevel() creates file in different levels, then with one further compaction on the ingested file, it can result in two same keys both with seqno 0 in two different levels. Then with iterator's [optimization](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blame/c62f3221698fd273b673d4f7e54eabb8329a4369/db/db_iter.cc#L342-L343) that assumes no two same keys both with seqno 0, it will either break this assertion in debug build or, even worst, return value of this same key for the key after it, which is the wrong value to return, in release build. Therefore we decide to introduce range conflict check for file ingestion and RefitLevel() inspired from the existing range conflict check among compactions. **Summary:** - Treat file ingestion job and RefitLevel() as `Compaction` of new compaction reasons: `CompactionReason::kExternalSstIngestion` and `CompactionReason::kRefitLevel` and register/unregister them. File ingestion is treated as compaction from L0 to different levels and RefitLevel() as compaction from source level to target level. - Check for `RangeOverlapWithCompaction` with other ongoing compactions, `RegisterCompaction()` on this "compaction" before changing the LSM state in `VersionStorageInfo`, and `UnregisterCompaction()` after changing. - Replace scattered fixes (0f88160, 5c64fb6 and 87dfc1d.) that prevents overlapping between file ingestion and non-refit-level compaction with this fix cuz those practices are easy to overlook. - Misc: logic cleanup, see PR comments Pull Request resolved: #10988 Test Plan: - New unit test `DBCompactionTestWithOngoingFileIngestionParam*` that failed pre-fix and passed afterwards. - Made compatible with existing tests, see PR comments - make check - [Ongoing] Stress test rehearsal with normal value and aggressive CI value #10761 Reviewed By: cbi42 Differential Revision: D41535685 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 549833a577ba1496d20a870583d4caa737da1258
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.