text in exception#33
Conversation
|
okay so the master merge destroyed my feature .. but now its back and working. |
| 'control_deviation': Quantity(s2f(get(table, 6, 1)), 'arcsec'), | ||
| 'moon_distance': Quantity(s2f(get(table, 7, 1)), 'deg'), | ||
| }) | ||
| text = '' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like only the try except block is new. As intended.
| def drive_pointing(url=None, timeout=None, fallback=False): | ||
| if url is None: | ||
| url = os.path.join(smartfacturl, 'pointing.data') | ||
| text = '' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also only the try except block.
| 'free_space_daq': storage_daq, | ||
| 'smartfact_runtime': get(table, 30, 1), | ||
| }) | ||
| text = '' |
|
|
||
| def test_text_in_exception(): | ||
| test_file_dir = path.join( | ||
| path.dirname(sfc.__file__), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have the feeling this should use pkg_resources. I use pkg_resources for this task. But on the other hand dunderscore file dunderscore is more explicit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes it should. But this PR is not fixing that
| def build_run(tup): | ||
| start, run_type, source, run_id = tup | ||
| run_id = int(run_id) | ||
| start, run_type, source, run_id = tup |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why was this indented here to two tabs?
| def parse_table(text): | ||
| return [ | ||
| line.split('\t') | ||
| for line in html.unescape(text).splitlines() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
was the html.unescape() removed on purpose? Or was it lost accidentally while rearranging the line?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah, I see. It is removed on purpose.
|
|
||
| return parse_table(text) | ||
| text = html.unescape(text) | ||
| return parse_table(text), text |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Makes sense, return the easy access table and the unescaped raw text.
|
|
||
| return to_namedtuple('CurrentPage', { | ||
| 'timestamp': sft2dt(get(table, 0, 0)), | ||
| 'calibrated': ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These lines where only broken to new line? right?
2 participants
regarding issue #31