Skip to content

Comments

jsiegel/spad_chk: add in better handholding and a fd_spad_alloc_check#4652

Closed
jumpsiegel wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
jsiegel/spad_chk
Closed

jsiegel/spad_chk: add in better handholding and a fd_spad_alloc_check#4652
jumpsiegel wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
jsiegel/spad_chk

Conversation

@jumpsiegel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jumpsiegel jumpsiegel requested a review from kbowers-jump March 27, 2025 17:46
@jumpsiegel jumpsiegel marked this pull request as draft March 27, 2025 18:48
@jumpsiegel jumpsiegel force-pushed the jsiegel/spad_chk branch 2 times, most recently from 25215f5 to ea3b4cb Compare March 31, 2025 10:40
@jumpsiegel jumpsiegel marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2025 12:54
Copy link
Contributor

@ibhatt-jumptrading ibhatt-jumptrading left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't look at the util changes, but this looks good. Does this work with the new exec changes too? Looks good otherwise

@jumpsiegel jumpsiegel enabled auto-merge April 1, 2025 11:39
@jumpsiegel jumpsiegel force-pushed the jsiegel/spad_chk branch 2 times, most recently from 1d3be01 to e271302 Compare April 1, 2025 15:57
Copy link
Contributor

@topointon-jump topointon-jump left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor comments

topointon-jump
topointon-jump previously approved these changes Apr 1, 2025
@jumpsiegel jumpsiegel added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 1, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Apr 1, 2025
@jumpsiegel jumpsiegel force-pushed the jsiegel/spad_chk branch 2 times, most recently from 5caa2f6 to 6a7a4a7 Compare April 2, 2025 12:44
@jumpsiegel jumpsiegel marked this pull request as draft April 2, 2025 13:04
@jumpsiegel jumpsiegel force-pushed the jsiegel/spad_chk branch 2 times, most recently from cc04d32 to 668cd3c Compare April 7, 2025 12:34
@jumpsiegel jumpsiegel force-pushed the jsiegel/spad_chk branch 7 times, most recently from dd25975 to ca714c9 Compare April 16, 2025 12:19
@jumpsiegel jumpsiegel marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2025 12:21
Comment on lines +444 to +447
static inline void *
fd_spad_alloc_check( fd_spad_t * spad,
ulong align,
ulong sz );
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
static inline void *
fd_spad_alloc_check( fd_spad_t * spad,
ulong align,
ulong sz );
void *
fd_spad_alloc_check( fd_spad_t * spad,
ulong align,
ulong sz );

The method body in this function is in fd_spad.c

@ripatel-fd
Copy link
Contributor

@jumpsiegel Looks good. Could you rebase?

@jumpsiegel jumpsiegel closed this Jun 26, 2025
@ripatel-fd ripatel-fd deleted the jsiegel/spad_chk branch January 2, 2026 15:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants