Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add libwebsockets-dev dependency #4

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 26, 2025
Merged

Add libwebsockets-dev dependency #4

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 26, 2025

Conversation

iche033
Copy link
Contributor

@iche033 iche033 commented Feb 20, 2025

@@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ Package: libgz-sim10-dev
Architecture: any
Section: libdevel
Depends: libtinyxml2-dev,
libwebsockets-dev,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it only being used in the development package? or should we expect to see it in runtime use cases even if no development tool is installed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm I copied from gz-launch which only adds it to the libgz-launch9-dev package. However, I am linking to websocket shared library in the websocket server system's CMakeLists.txt here. So I think I should add this to libgz-sim10-plugins right?

Added in f97c648. Let me know if that's not correct.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm I copied from gz-launch which only adds it to the libgz-launch9-dev package. However, I am linking to websocket shared library in the websocket server system's CMakeLists.txt here. So I think I should add this to libgz-sim10-plugins right?

Ops sorry, I was not correct on the coment. The runtime dependencies should be handled by ${shlibs:Depends} in the binary runtime package so we should be covered and the gz-launch packaging is right.

Going to revert the last commit and merge since it was fine at the beginning. Sorry for the noise Ian.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah understood, thanks!

@j-rivero j-rivero merged commit 0b3d52a into main Feb 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants