Skip to content

chore: replace resolver-oxc with new resolver-typescript #4230

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2025
Merged

chore: replace resolver-oxc with new resolver-typescript #4230

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2025

Conversation

JounQin
Copy link
Contributor

@JounQin JounQin commented Apr 13, 2025 •
edited by eamodio
Loading

Description

Just quote from another PR: SocketDev/socket-cli#386 (comment)

Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in the Contributing document
  • My changes follow the coding style of this project
  • My changes build without any errors or warnings
  • My changes have been formatted and linted
  • My changes include any required corresponding changes to the documentation (including CHANGELOG.md and README.md)
  • My changes have been rebased and squashed to the minimal number (typically 1) of relevant commits
  • My changes have a descriptive commit message with a short title, including a Fixes $XXX - or Closes #XXX - prefix to auto-close the issue that your PR addresses

@eamodio eamodio force-pushed the refactor/import-resolver branch from b15d903 to fd064f7 Compare April 13, 2025 21:40
eamodio
eamodio approved these changes Apr 13, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@eamodio eamodio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your contribution!

Thank you

@eamodio eamodio merged commit a8879aa into gitkraken:main Apr 13, 2025
@JounQin JounQin deleted the refactor/import-resolver branch April 14, 2025 00:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@eamodio eamodio eamodio approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@JounQin @eamodio