Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Agit pull request permission check #32999

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 27, 2024

Conversation

a1012112796
Copy link
Member

user with read permission should also can create agit flow pull request. looks this logic was broken in #31033 this pull request try fix it and add test code.

user with read permission should also can create agit flow pull request.
looks this logic was broken in go-gitea#31033
this pull request try fix it and add test code.

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <[email protected]>
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Dec 27, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code label Dec 27, 2024
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <[email protected]>
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ func NewPullRequest(ctx context.Context, opts *NewPullRequestOptions) error {
}

// user should be a collaborator or a member of the organization for base repo
if !issue.Poster.IsAdmin {
if (!issue.Poster.IsAdmin) && pr.Flow == issues_model.PullRequestFlowGithub {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if (!issue.Poster.IsAdmin) && pr.Flow == issues_model.PullRequestFlowGithub {
canCreate := issue.Poster.IsAdmin || pr.Flow == issues_model.PullRequestFlowAGit
if !canCreate {

But should we also check something like "repo read permission" for "agit" to create?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But should we also check something like "repo read permission" for "agit" to create?

looks user already can't create pull request in my local test.

image

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Dec 27, 2024
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang added the backport/v1.23 This PR should be backported to Gitea 1.23 label Dec 27, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Dec 27, 2024
@lunny lunny added the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Dec 27, 2024
@lunny lunny enabled auto-merge (squash) December 27, 2024 17:52
@lunny lunny merged commit a7b2707 into go-gitea:main Dec 27, 2024
26 checks passed
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added this to the 1.24.0 milestone Dec 27, 2024
GiteaBot pushed a commit to GiteaBot/gitea that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2024
user with read permission should also can create agit flow pull request.
looks this logic was broken in
go-gitea#31033 this pull request try fix
it and add test code.

---------

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <[email protected]>
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added backport/done All backports for this PR have been created and removed reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. labels Dec 27, 2024
@a1012112796 a1012112796 deleted the zzc/dev/agit_perm branch December 28, 2024 03:12
lunny pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2024
Backport #32999 by @a1012112796

user with read permission should also can create agit flow pull request.
looks this logic was broken in
#31033 this pull request try fix
it and add test code.

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <[email protected]>
zjjhot added a commit to zjjhot/gitea that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2024
* giteaofficial/main:
  Refactor pagination (go-gitea#33037)
  Test webhook email (go-gitea#33033)
  Fix review code comment avatar alignment (go-gitea#33031)
  Fix templating in pull request comparison (go-gitea#33025)
  Refactor tests (go-gitea#33021)
  [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin
  always show assignees on right (go-gitea#33006)
  fix toggle commit body button ui when latest commit message is long (go-gitea#32997)
  Fix and/or comment some legacy CSS problems (go-gitea#33015)
  Refactor comment history and fix content edit (go-gitea#33018)
  Fix bug on activities (go-gitea#33008)
  Refactor arch route handlers (go-gitea#32993)
  fix scoped label ui when contains emoji (go-gitea#33007)
  [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin
  De-emphasize signed commits (go-gitea#31160)
  Fix eslint (go-gitea#33002)
  Fix Agit pull request permission check (go-gitea#32999)
  Support for email addresses containing uppercase characters when activating user account (go-gitea#32998)
@go-gitea go-gitea locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 27, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport/done All backports for this PR have been created backport/v1.23 This PR should be backported to Gitea 1.23 lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants