Skip to content

feat(OpenQuantumProblems): Formalization of open quantum problem 35#3491

Open
MarioKrenn6240 wants to merge 3 commits intogoogle-deepmind:mainfrom
MarioKrenn6240:oqp35-ame
Open

feat(OpenQuantumProblems): Formalization of open quantum problem 35#3491
MarioKrenn6240 wants to merge 3 commits intogoogle-deepmind:mainfrom
MarioKrenn6240:oqp35-ame

Conversation

@MarioKrenn6240
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This PR adds a formalization of Open Quantum Problem 35 from the IQOQI Vienna Open Quantum Problems list: existence of absolutely maximally entangled pure states.

Mathematical content

For integers n ≥ 2 and d ≥ 2, the problem asks for which pairs (n,d) there exists a pure AME(n,d) state.

A pure state ψ on n parties of local dimension d is absolutely maximally entangled (AME) if, for every subset of at most half of the parties, the corresponding reduced density matrix is maximally mixed.

In the formalization, a multipartite pure state is represented by a computational-basis amplitude function
ψ : (Fin n → Fin d) → ℂ,
together with an explicit normalization condition.

The reduced density matrix on the first m parties is defined by summing over the remaining n - m parties, and the AME condition is encoded by requiring maximal mixing after arbitrary permutations of the parties, which is equivalent to checking all subsystems of size ⌊n / 2⌋.

What is introduced

The file defines:

  • IsNormalized for normalized multipartite pure states,
  • reducedDensityFirst for the reduced density matrix on the first subsystem block,
  • HasMaximallyMixedFirstReduction for maximal mixing of a chosen reduction,
  • IsAME for absolutely maximally entangled pure states,
  • ExistsAME n d for existence of an AME(n,d) state.

It also introduces a reusable witness family:

  • diagonalState for the uniform superposition over constant computational-basis strings,
  • bellState and ghzState as special cases of this family.

The key reusable lemma is:

  • reducedDensityFirst_of_completion, showing that a state given by a uniform superposition over the graph of an injective completion map has maximally mixed reduction.

Included results

The PR includes:

  • the open theorem oqp_35, expressing the full classification problem for all n ≥ 2 and d ≥ 2,
  • the open theorems ame_8_4_open and ame_7_6_open, expressing two especially important small unresolved cases,
  • the formally witnessed existence results ame_2_exists and ame_3_exists, obtained from the Bell and GHZ families,
  • benchmark solved/source-backed theorems for AME(2,2), AME(3,2), AME(5,2), AME(6,2), AME(4,2), AME(7,2), AME(4,3), and AME(4,6),
  • the sanity-check negative result ghzState4_not_ame, showing that the 4-party GHZ family is not AME for d ≥ 2.

The Bell and 3-party GHZ witnesses are proved directly in Lean via the generic completion criterion.

Background

An AME(n,d) state is equivalently a pure state that is maximally entangled across every bipartition, or a ⌊n / 2⌋-uniform state.

The problem is closely related to quantum error-correcting codes: existence of an AME(n,d) state is equivalent to existence of a pure ((n,1,⌊n/2⌋+1))_d quantum code.

For qubits (d = 2), AME states exist only for n = 2, 3, 5, 6; in particular, there is no AME(4,2) and no AME(7,2).
A particularly notable solved case is AME(4,6), whose construction goes beyond the usual stabilizer/classical-code framework.
In higher local dimensions, the full classification remains open.

References

Primary source list entry:

Foundational and benchmark references included in the docstring:

  • W. Helwig, W. Cui, A. Riera, J. I. Latorre, and H.-K. Lo, Absolute Maximal Entanglement and Quantum Secret Sharing, Phys. Rev. A 86, 052335 (2012).
  • D. Goyeneche, D. Alsina, J. I. Latorre, A. Riera, and K. Życzkowski, Absolutely Maximally Entangled states, combinatorial designs and multi-unitary matrices, Phys. Rev. A 92, 032316 (2015).
  • A. Higuchi and A. Sudbery, How entangled can two couples get?, Phys. Lett. A 273, 213–217 (2000).
  • A. J. Scott, Multipartite entanglement, quantum-error-correcting codes, and entangling power of quantum evolutions, Phys. Rev. A 69, 052330 (2004).
  • F. Huber, O. Gühne, and J. Siewert, Absolutely maximally entangled states of seven qubits do not exist, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 200502 (2017).
  • F. Huber and M. Grassl, Quantum Codes of Maximal Distance and Highly Entangled Subspaces, Quantum 4, 284 (2020).
  • S. A. Rather, A. Burchardt, W. Bruzda, G. Rajchel-Mieldzioć, A. Lakshminarayan, and K. Życzkowski, Thirty-six entangled officers of Euler: Quantum solution to a classically impossible problem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 080507 (2022).

Closes #3452.

Assisted by GPT Pro 5.4.

@MarioKrenn6240 MarioKrenn6240 changed the title Create formalization of open quantum problem 35 feat(OpenQuantumProblems): Formalization of open quantum problem 35 Mar 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Formalize Open Quantum Problem #35: Existence of absolutely maximally entangled pure states

1 participant