You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Recently, I simulate a strut robot on a ball. This strut will move on the ball and the adhesion actuator is used to add the contact force between them in order to increase the friction force to resist the gravity.
However, the strut is always sliding eventhough I have set the friction coefficient '1'.
I think I have solved this problem after I set the 'noslip_iterations'.
The description in the XML like that:
"This is a post-processing step executed after the main solver. It uses a modified PGS method to suppress slip/drift in friction dimensions resulting from the soft-constraint model."
I am thinking why the soft-constraint model will lead to this situation? This sliding process just likes the error is increasing.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Recently, I simulate a strut robot on a ball. This strut will move on the ball and the adhesion actuator is used to add the contact force between them in order to increase the friction force to resist the gravity.
However, the strut is always sliding eventhough I have set the friction coefficient '1'.
I think I have solved this problem after I set the 'noslip_iterations'.
The description in the XML like that:
"This is a post-processing step executed after the main solver. It uses a modified PGS method to suppress slip/drift in friction dimensions resulting from the soft-constraint model."
I am thinking why the soft-constraint model will lead to this situation? This sliding process just likes the error is increasing.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions