integration: adjust tests for containerd snapshotters #3766
Conversation
Attempt to adjust the tests to work with a docker daemon using the containerd snapshotters (which would have, e.g., "overlayfs" instead of "overlay2" as storage driver). Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <[email protected]>
|
haven't tested locally, so (ab)using CI to see if it passes, but looks like it needs approval again @dims 🙈 (is there some way around that, or is it for all contributors ?) |
|
i am here for you @thaJeztah :) (not a GOOG employee, so am a guest here! can't fiddle with things) |
|
@thaJeztah for now please rebase your other PR, we pinned the SHA of the image: |
|
Thank you! Yes, these are a bit of a nuisance; debugging CI usually is a bit of trial-and-error, and I'm not very familiar with the codebase, so that makes it extra fun. OK got some other failures. Maybe I should look if I can run these tests locally somewhere; of course don't let me stop others from digging in as well! (for anyone stumbling on this PR).
oh, thanks, will do! |
2 participants
relates to #3761 (comment)
Attempt to adjust the tests to work with a docker daemon using the containerd snapshotters (which would have, e.g., "overlayfs" instead of "overlay2" as storage driver).