Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: use skip instead of a condition so that go-snaps knows snapshots are not obsolete #1594

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2025

Conversation

G-Rath
Copy link
Collaborator

@G-Rath G-Rath commented Feb 9, 2025

Currently, because we're not using snaps.Skip the Windows and MacOS test suites report obsolete snapshots that should be cleaned up

@G-Rath G-Rath force-pushed the test/skip branch 2 times, most recently from 854cae1 to acb119a Compare February 9, 2025 20:13
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.31%. Comparing base (c100a26) to head (5b37124).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1594      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.30%   69.31%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         200      200              
  Lines       19033    19033              
==========================================
+ Hits        13190    13193       +3     
+ Misses       5135     5133       -2     
+ Partials      708      707       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@another-rex another-rex merged commit 0c598f8 into google:main Feb 9, 2025
13 checks passed
@another-rex another-rex deleted the test/skip branch February 9, 2025 22:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants