Skip to content

chore: demo of changes from sdk-platform-java#3737 #3029

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

diegomarquezp
Copy link
Contributor

@diegomarquezp diegomarquezp commented Apr 10, 2025

See sdk-platform-java#3737 for more context.
TL;DR: we are introducing an additional Kokoro job to run native tests against GraalVM for JDK 17.0.9

See the PR in sdk-platform-java for more context.
TL;DR: we are introducing an additional Kokoro job to run native tests against GraalVM for JDK 17.0.9
@diegomarquezp diegomarquezp requested review from a team as code owners April 10, 2025 23:53
Copy link

generated-files-bot bot commented Apr 10, 2025

Warning: This pull request is touching the following templated files:

  • .github/generated-files-bot.yml
  • .github/workflows/samples.yaml
  • .kokoro/build.sh

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: m Pull request size is medium. api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/java-storage API. labels Apr 10, 2025
@diegomarquezp diegomarquezp changed the title chore: demo of changes from https://github.com/googleapis/sdk-platform-java/pull/3737 chore: demo of changes from sdk-platform-java#3737 Apr 10, 2025
@diegomarquezp diegomarquezp marked this pull request as draft April 10, 2025 23:54
env_vars: {
key: "IT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_EMAIL"
value: "[email protected]"
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for pointing it out. Although this is just a draft, I was thinking of manually remove them once the generator image brings these templates (the generator doesn't remove templated files). I'll keep you posted with our decision.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two steps is okay in my mind, but it will put extra strain on the native image build pool have 5 configs instead of the 2 today or 3 tomorrow.

We'll also need to update the https://github.com/googleapis/java-storage/blob/main/.github/sync-repo-settings.yaml#L5-L21 so the correct jobs are PR gates

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

extra strain

I meant to mention that the eventual template update PR would have a manual commit (by me) removing these configs. On the google3 side, there will only be a jump from 2 configs to 3.

sync-repo-settings

Thanks, I was missing that part of the migration.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, sync-repo-settings is a special case. The generation process can only create a new one, not update it. It will therefore be a manual commit in the eventual update PR.

.kokoro/build.sh Outdated
Comment on lines 80 to 93
graalvmA)
# Run Unit and Integration Tests with Native Image
mvn -B ${INTEGRATION_TEST_ARGS} -ntp -Pnative test
RETURN_CODE=$?
;;
graalvmB)
# Run Unit and Integration Tests with Native Image
mvn -B ${INTEGRATION_TEST_ARGS} -ntp -Pnative test
RETURN_CODE=$?
;;
graalvm17)
graalvmC)
# Run Unit and Integration Tests with Native Image
mvn -B ${INTEGRATION_TEST_ARGS} -ntp -Pnative test
RETURN_CODE=$?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure why we need tree different job types that are all exactly the same.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I discussed with @mpeddada1 and this redundancy was probably kept under the assumption they may eventually differ, but it hasn't happened so far. Thanks again for pointing this inconsistency out. I'll soon use a singe graalvm) case.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We decided to just use graalvm)

diegomarquezp added a commit to googleapis/sdk-platform-java that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
Context: [we will introduce a new GraalVM
job](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bOeGtVFLsq5ts71If5pFXCvHIeNpbtBRvF6XQfavLZs/edit?tab=t.dcjxhf429j6t#bookmark=id.3s7d4dj247hr)
and will leverage the hermetic build templates to propagate this change
to some of the repositories. Each PR will be followed with ad-hoc
changes such as sync-repo-settings (the cannot be templated).

Demo PRs
 * googleapis/java-bigtable#2558
 * googleapis/java-bigquerystorage#2937
 * googleapis/java-storage#3029
 * googleapis/java-datastore#1816
* There are manual changes in `build.sh`. We will add this file to the
[ignored files in
owlbot.py](https://github.com/googleapis/java-datastore/blob/8ceb62b5182e30b4f771d6c1b586a22fb084c9ac/owlbot.py#L48-L57)
and will raise an issue to move this logic elsewhere (if feasible).
 * googleapis/java-firestore#2074
 * googleapis/java-logging#1789
 * googleapis/java-pubsub#2389
 * googleapis/java-pubsublite#1839
 * googleapis/java-spanner#3821
lqiu96 pushed a commit to googleapis/sdk-platform-java that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
Context: [we will introduce a new GraalVM
job](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bOeGtVFLsq5ts71If5pFXCvHIeNpbtBRvF6XQfavLZs/edit?tab=t.dcjxhf429j6t#bookmark=id.3s7d4dj247hr)
and will leverage the hermetic build templates to propagate this change
to some of the repositories. Each PR will be followed with ad-hoc
changes such as sync-repo-settings (the cannot be templated).

Demo PRs
 * googleapis/java-bigtable#2558
 * googleapis/java-bigquerystorage#2937
 * googleapis/java-storage#3029
 * googleapis/java-datastore#1816
* There are manual changes in `build.sh`. We will add this file to the
[ignored files in
owlbot.py](https://github.com/googleapis/java-datastore/blob/8ceb62b5182e30b4f771d6c1b586a22fb084c9ac/owlbot.py#L48-L57)
and will raise an issue to move this logic elsewhere (if feasible).
 * googleapis/java-firestore#2074
 * googleapis/java-logging#1789
 * googleapis/java-pubsub#2389
 * googleapis/java-pubsublite#1839
 * googleapis/java-spanner#3821
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/java-storage API. size: m Pull request size is medium.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants