Skip to content

Conversation

@klavavej
Copy link
Contributor

This issueless PR is in response to this discussion

  • Description of PR changes above includes a link to an existing GitHub issue
  • PR title is prefixed with one of: [BUGFIX], [FEATURE], [DOCS], [MAINTENANCE], [CONTRIB], [MINORBUMP]
  • Code is linted - run invoke lint (uses ruff format + ruff check)
  • Appropriate tests and docs have been updated

For more information about contributing, visit our community resources.

After you submit your PR, keep the page open and monitor the statuses of the various checks made by our continuous integration process at the bottom of the page. Please fix any issues that come up and reach out on Slack if you need help. Thanks for contributing!

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Deploy Preview for niobium-lead-7998 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0324a82
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/niobium-lead-7998/deploys/6920f7f60ca88a00085208f0
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-11530.docs.greatexpectations.io
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.77%. Comparing base (6068546) to head (0324a82).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #11530      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    83.88%   83.77%   -0.11%     
===========================================
  Files          464      464              
  Lines        39157    39157              
===========================================
- Hits         32847    32805      -42     
- Misses        6310     6352      +42     
Flag Coverage Δ
3.10 72.87% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
3.10 athena 41.62% <ø> (ø)
3.10 aws_deps 46.02% <ø> (ø)
3.10 big 55.38% <ø> (ø)
3.10 bigquery 50.60% <ø> (ø)
3.10 clickhouse 41.64% <ø> (ø)
3.10 databricks 52.38% <ø> (ø)
3.10 filesystem 64.19% <ø> (ø)
3.10 gx-redshift 50.68% <ø> (ø)
3.10 mssql 50.87% <ø> (ø)
3.10 mysql ?
3.10 openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds ?
3.10 postgresql 54.68% <ø> (ø)
3.10 snowflake 53.20% <ø> (ø)
3.10 spark 55.42% <ø> (ø)
3.10 spark_connect ?
3.10 trino 48.31% <ø> (ø)
3.11 72.92% <ø> (ø)
3.11 athena ?
3.11 aws_deps ?
3.11 big ?
3.11 clickhouse ?
3.11 filesystem ?
3.11 mysql ?
3.11 openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds ?
3.11 postgresql ?
3.11 spark_connect ?
3.12 72.93% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
3.12 athena ?
3.12 aws_deps ?
3.12 big ?
3.12 filesystem ?
3.12 mysql ?
3.12 openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds ?
3.12 postgresql ?
3.12 spark_connect ?
3.13 72.93% <ø> (ø)
3.13 athena 41.62% <ø> (ø)
3.13 aws_deps 46.02% <ø> (ø)
3.13 big 55.38% <ø> (ø)
3.13 bigquery 50.61% <ø> (ø)
3.13 clickhouse 41.64% <ø> (ø)
3.13 databricks 52.38% <ø> (ø)
3.13 filesystem 64.19% <ø> (ø)
3.13 gx-redshift 50.68% <ø> (ø)
3.13 mssql 50.87% <ø> (ø)
3.13 mysql 51.14% <ø> (ø)
3.13 openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds ?
3.13 postgresql 54.68% <ø> (ø)
3.13 snowflake 53.20% <ø> (ø)
3.13 spark 55.43% <ø> (ø)
3.13 spark_connect ?
3.13 trino 48.31% <ø> (ø)
cloud 0.00% <ø> (ø)
docs-basic 58.78% <ø> (ø)
docs-creds-needed 56.04% <ø> (?)
docs-spark 56.88% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@klavavej klavavej marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2025 23:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants