support soft-only memory oversubscription #488
+47
−9
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Implement driver-side support in the exec and docker drivers for `resource.memory_max = -1`, which allows a soft-only memory limit for clusters with oversubscription enabled. This was already allowed by the server, but undocumented and unevenly supported by drivers. Ref: hashicorp/nomad#27354 Ref: https://hashicorp.atlassian.net/browse/NMD-911 Ref: hashicorp/web-unified-docs#1629
7 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implement driver-side support in the exec and docker drivers for
resource.memory_max = -1, which allows a soft-only memory limit for clusters with oversubscription enabled. This was already allowed by the server, but undocumented and unevenly supported by drivers.Ref: hashicorp/nomad#27354
Ref: https://hashicorp.atlassian.net/browse/NMD-911
Ref: hashicorp/web-unified-docs#1629
Changes to Security Controls
Are there any changes to security controls (access controls, encryption, logging) in this pull request? If so, explain.