-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Quirks wiki
This project is documented in Markdown
under it's wiki-pages, which in
turn are SCM:ed by git
and front-ended by either or both:
The two front-ends work in a similar fashion, both use git
as back-end
which is excellent. The main difference is that with Gitit
you work
locally and don't depend on either network connectivity or Github
.
Their respective Markdown
flavours are however not entirely compatible
with each other. As we love non lock-in and transparency, we want the wiki
to run on both systems.
Pointing these differences out is the main the purpose for this "quirks" page.
Github
, being the lesser Markdown
-complaint system and having it's own
extensions, writing pages in Github very easily becomes non-portable.
As mentioned, we don't like lock-in
, and neither should you. It's pure
evil and a plague that has haunted computer science practically since from
it's birth. It goes against the very heart and soul of Free
Software, and even
FOSS for that matter. Avoid avoid
avoid...
Editing markdown pages you can use either of the above front-ends. I
however find it much nicer to edit them with the Vim
plug-in
instant-markdown
included as sub-module in this project.
You get instant WYSIWYG which makes the need to git-commit just to test the rendering of a page much less needed.
Additional benefits of this practice:
- You can squash commits that belong together just as you would do with source-code, thereby avoid too much clobbering of the git-history.
- Using
Vim
you would naturally write text that is readable in *ANY EDITOR. NeitherGitit
andGithub
promote clear-text readability this, especially when it comes to line lengt's. - Sane line-lengt's makes diffs even in text much easier to read, grasp and manage.
Github
expects file-names not to contain white-spaces which is
non-Markdown
complient. Instead dashes (-
) should be used. To make
Wiki work on both Github and Gitit, we'll adapt to the lesser. Rendering in
Gitit looks annoyng with the dashes visible in page headers but it's a
compromize we can live with.
I.e. documentation with sub-directories.
- Github wiki supports it, but you can't create structure in Github. If you try, it will still be flat, and a Github-extention (evil grin) will make links pointing to pages in sub-directories still work (Huh? Naming conflicts someone...?)
- Github has a page reference to the right which renders flat. This makes it
hard to distinguish pages based on name only. Therefore all pages in
sub-directiries additionally carries the subdirectory in it's name. For
rendering purposes, first letter will be in capital however regardless of
the subdirectory-name however. For example, this page is under
./quirks/
and its name isQuirks-wiki.md
(i.e. full path-name becomes./quirks/Quirks-wiki.md
)
Hint: For structured documentation, don't use Githog
. If you must use
Githog
at all, use it for editing already existing pages.
- Github does not support unnamed links in the format
[Page]()
where the actual file should be assumed namedPage.md
in the same directory as the page refering to it. Avoid this short-form. - Github supports links in media-wiki format
[[A-Page]]
. It's an extension and hence it doesn't work on other systems/renderers. Avoid non-standard format. - Github does not support
link-anchoring in the form
[AnchorTo](Page#Subsection)
. We'll adapt to the lesser and will avoid this.
This open project is sponsored by Helsinova AB
This is a sidebar...