Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix tests in devcontainer by removing resolution center #5702

Merged

Conversation

agners
Copy link
Member

@agners agners commented Mar 1, 2025

Proposed change

Since #5696 we don't need to load the resolution center early. In fact, with #5686 this is even problematic for pytests in devcontainer, since the Supervisor Core state is valid and this causes AppArmor evaluations to run (and fail).

Actually, #5696 removed the resolution center. #5686 brought it accidentally back. This was seemingly a merge error.

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to the supervisor)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:
  • Link to cli pull request:
  • Link to client library pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format supervisor tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If API endpoints or add-on configuration are added/changed:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Streamlined internal test setup by removing unnecessary initialization steps to enhance stability during testing.

Since #5696 we don't need to load the resolution center early. In fact,
with #5686 this is even problematic for pytests in devcontainer, since
the Supervisor Core state is valid and this causes AppArmor evaluations
to run (and fail).

Actually, #5696 removed the resolution center. #5686 brought it
accidentally back. This was seemingly a merge error.
@agners agners added bugfix A bug fix test Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests labels Mar 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 1, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This change removes the asynchronous call to load the resolution center from the coresys fixture in tests/conftest.py. The line await coresys_obj.resolution.load() has been deleted from the test setup, meaning that the coresys_obj will no longer load its resolution center during initialization. All other aspects of the test fixture, including the creation and initialization of various properties, remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
tests/conftest.py Removed the asynchronous call await coresys_obj.resolution.load() from the coresys fixture setup.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant TR as Test Runner
    participant CF as coresys Fixture
    %% The Resolution Center is no longer called in the fixture.
    TR->>CF: Initialize coresys_obj
    CF->>CF: Create and configure coresys_obj (without resolution load)
    CF-->>TR: Return configured coresys_obj
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fcb3e2e and fe81c7f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/conftest.py (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • tests/conftest.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests Python 3.13.2
  • GitHub Check: Build armhf supervisor

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@agners agners merged commit 12c951f into main Mar 1, 2025
22 checks passed
@agners agners deleted the fix-pytest-in-devcontainer-by-removing-resolution-center branch March 1, 2025 15:00
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 3, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bugfix A bug fix cla-signed test Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants