Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve cache kvstore's performance #58

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2024
Merged

improve cache kvstore's performance #58

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2024

Conversation

Vritra4
Copy link
Collaborator

@Vritra4 Vritra4 commented Aug 20, 2024

some implicit Set() to improve performance of the cache kvstore
reference: https://github.com/initia-labs/minievm/blob/0a498365fd38cdc59e0ea0f5c7a505bbd9772db4/indexer/store.go

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the CacheStore implementation for improved clarity and structure.
    • Updated methods for better error handling and key validation.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of cache misses in the Get method.
    • Enhanced key existence checks in the Has method with caching.
  • Refactor

    • Replaced types package references with storetypes for more specific type handling.
    • Updated constructor and method signatures to align with new type definitions.

@Vritra4 Vritra4 added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 20, 2024
@Vritra4 Vritra4 requested a review from SeUkKim August 20, 2024 05:10
@Vritra4 Vritra4 self-assigned this Aug 20, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes to the CacheStore implementation enhance clarity and robustness by updating type references from the types package to the more specific storetypes package. This improves error handling, particularly in the Get, Has, and Delete methods, while ensuring the struct properly implements the corestoretypes.KVStore interface. Overall, these modifications streamline the cache management process and align the code structure with SDK expectations.

Changes

Files Change Summary
store/cache_kvstore.go Updated CacheStore to use storetypes instead of types, ensuring proper interface implementation and enhancing method error handling for cache operations.

Poem

🐰 In the code where bunnies play,
We’ve tidied up the Cache today!
With storetypes now in the lead,
Our cache is swift, it’s all we need!
So hop along, let’s celebrate,
For cleaner code, we can’t be late! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Vritra4 Vritra4 requested a review from joon9823 August 20, 2024 05:11
@Vritra4 Vritra4 changed the title improve cache kvstore performance improve cache kvstore's performance Aug 20, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@joon9823 joon9823 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e4f1e3 and eeba6e9.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • store/cache_kvstore.go (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (8)
store/cache_kvstore.go (8)

13-13: Interface implementation check is a good practice.

Ensuring CacheStore implements corestoretypes.KVStore at compile time is a good practice.


20-20: Function signature update aligns with package specificity.

Updating the NewCacheStore function to use storetypes.KVStore enhances clarity and specificity.


37-53: Improved robustness in Get method.

The use of storetypes.AssertValidKey for key validation and graceful handling of cache misses enhances the method's robustness.


57-72: Enhanced efficiency in Has method.

Using storetypes.AssertValidKey for key validation and caching the store lookup result improves the method's efficiency.


Line range hint 75-87: Improved data integrity in Set method.

Using storetypes.AssertValidKey and storetypes.AssertValidValue for validation ensures that only valid entries are cached, enhancing data integrity.


89-99: Enhanced error handling in Delete method.

Using storetypes.AssertValidKey for key validation and wrapping errors for cache deletion failures improves error handling.


102-110: Consistency in iterator types for Iterator method.

Returning storetypes.Iterator ensures consistency with the updated package references.


112-120: Consistency in iterator types for ReverseIterator method.

Returning storetypes.Iterator ensures consistency with the updated package references.

@SeUkKim SeUkKim merged commit d18034a into main Aug 20, 2024
4 checks passed
@Vritra4 Vritra4 deleted the chore/improve-cache branch August 20, 2024 05:28
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants