Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RDAP format: It may become mandatory to specify the holder name field and abuse fields #10

Open
janwillemstegink opened this issue May 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

RDAP format: It may become mandatory to specify the holder name field and abuse fields #10

janwillemstegink opened this issue May 25, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@janwillemstegink
Copy link
Owner

janwillemstegink commented May 25, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The RDAP format needs evalution.

  • It may become mandatory to specify the holder name field and abuse fields even if the value is hidden or empty.
    RDAP output can improve communication.

The EU regulations move to a visible name of a holder who is ultimately responsible.
@janwillemstegink janwillemstegink changed the title RDAP proposal: The holder name field and abuse fields are unfortinately not yet mandatory, even if the value hidden or empty RDAP format: The holder name field and abuse fields are unfortunately acna become mandatory, even if the value hidden or empty May 25, 2024
@janwillemstegink janwillemstegink changed the title RDAP format: The holder name field and abuse fields are unfortunately acna become mandatory, even if the value hidden or empty RDAP format: It may become mandatory to specify the holder name field and abuse fields May 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@janwillemstegink