Skip to content

Issues: janwillemstegink/rdap.hostingtool.nl

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

22 Open 5 Closed
22 Open 5 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Dutch Chamber of Commerce: The website kvk.nl writes about web domains as if a requirement exists
#27 opened Jan 8, 2025 by janwillemstegink
2
SIDN: Add holder name in Whois using Python
#26 opened Dec 17, 2024 by janwillemstegink
CentralNic: Show the holder name with RDAP for the .frl geoTLD, if no hidden personal type
#24 opened Dec 15, 2024 by janwillemstegink
2
EU: eEvidence also requires a control loop for adjustment by the public
#23 opened Dec 9, 2024 by janwillemstegink
RDI: Reporting to the Dutch RDI inspection is problematic.
#22 opened Dec 9, 2024 by janwillemstegink
SIDN and VvR: The Dutch "Vereniging van Registrars" is incorrectly spelled as "Vereniging Van Registrars".
#21 opened Dec 9, 2024 by janwillemstegink
SIDN: Booking between income and expenses, such as the two million in discounts, is almost never allowed
#20 opened Dec 9, 2024 by janwillemstegink
IANA: For RDAP, a verification design is not far away and will need to be critically discussed.
#17 opened Dec 3, 2024 by janwillemstegink
IANA and CentralNic: RDAP fails without structured registry information
#16 opened Dec 3, 2024 by janwillemstegink
4
IANA and CentralNic: Hiding data in RDAP is not sufficient.
#15 opened Dec 3, 2024 by janwillemstegink
@xaben
7
SIDN: Bug in RDAP that the 'expiration' date-time is sometimes missing
#14 opened Dec 1, 2024 by janwillemstegink
SIDN: Eliminate all discounts and invoicing per change as unfair
#13 opened Sep 9, 2024 by janwillemstegink
SIDN: A next mature RDAP will benefit from a fixed field order
#12 opened Sep 8, 2024 by janwillemstegink
1
SIDN's RDAP confuses expiration of publishing, and after possible reactivation, deletion for the deregistering
#11 opened Aug 11, 2024 by janwillemstegink
5
RDAP format: It may become mandatory to specify the holder name field and abuse fields
#10 opened May 25, 2024 by janwillemstegink
SIDN's board could show the legally required separate portfolios
#9 opened Mar 15, 2024 by janwillemstegink
SIDN's RDAP may default for abuse with 'no point of contact' (mandatory value in gTLD zones)
#8 opened Feb 25, 2024 by janwillemstegink
SIDN's RDAP for 'Administratie door: SIDN BV' could be clearer
#7 opened Feb 24, 2024 by janwillemstegink
1
SIDN's site really needs a menu.
#6 opened Feb 24, 2024 by janwillemstegink
SIDN's RDAP would generalize by offering expiration, transferred (mandatory values in gTLD zones)
#5 opened Feb 24, 2024 by janwillemstegink
SIDN's RDAP misses kind 'individual'. A personal name publicly visible, is technically allowed.
#4 opened Feb 24, 2024 by janwillemstegink
1
SIDN's RDAP would stabilize with country codes (informative values in gTLD zones)
#3 opened Feb 24, 2024 by janwillemstegink
1
ProTip! Type g i on any issue or pull request to go back to the issue listing page.