Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SIDN's RDAP for 'Administratie door: SIDN BV' could be clearer #7

Open
janwillemstegink opened this issue Feb 24, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@janwillemstegink
Copy link
Owner

janwillemstegink commented Feb 24, 2024

Administratie door: SIDN BV (translates as: Administration by: SIDN BV)
Record maintained by: SIDN BV translates quite well as: Registratie wordt bijgehouden door: SIDN BV

All kinds of parties involved have their own administrative responsibility. SIDN cannot take care of everything.

The notary of the Articles of Association as of 1-1-2023 was not bothered by the name SIDN for the Foundation.
In retrospect, I think 'Stichting SIDN' would have been a working abbreviation, and also a trade name.
In the articles of association of the B.V. there is also no abbreviated as 'SIDN'.

The decision-making and executive powers of the Stichting Internet Domeinregistratie Nederland compared to SIDN B.V. are unclear to me. Their logos should also be distinctive. The domain data of sidn.nl, mentioning 'Stichting Internet Domeinregistratie Nederland', are inconsistent.

SIDN communicates the abbreviation B.V. without dots. The Dutch business register can provide the Trade Register with these types of trade names without dots.

@janwillemstegink janwillemstegink changed the title 'Administratie door: SIDN BV' could be clearer SIDN's RDAP for 'Administratie door: SIDN BV' could be clearer Feb 25, 2024
@janwillemstegink
Copy link
Owner Author

A real solution in RDAP is possible through a custom zone section.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant