Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pass DefaultConfiguration for SARIF output #301

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

attiasas
Copy link
Contributor

@attiasas attiasas commented Feb 6, 2025

  • The pull request is targeting the dev branch.
  • The code has been validated to compile successfully by running go vet ./....
  • The code has been formatted properly using go fmt ./....
  • All static analysis checks passed.
  • All tests have passed. If this feature is not already covered by the tests, new tests have been added.
  • Updated the Contributing page / ReadMe page / CI Workflow files if needed.
  • All changes are detailed at the description. if not already covered at JFrog Documentation, new documentation have been added.

Parse rules DefaultConfiguration value from scanners results and pass it to output.
This was parsed before implementing violations but removed when starting to clone rules

@attiasas attiasas added bug Something isn't working safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request labels Feb 6, 2025
@attiasas attiasas requested a review from eyalk007 February 6, 2025 09:39
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Feb 6, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Merging this branch will not change overall coverage

Impacted Packages Coverage Δ 🤖
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/utils/formats/sarifutils 0.00% (ø)

Coverage by file

Changed files (no unit tests)

Changed File Coverage Δ Total Covered Missed 🤖
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/utils/formats/sarifutils/sarifutils.go 0.00% (ø) 0 0 0

Please note that the "Total", "Covered", and "Missed" counts above refer to code statements instead of lines of code. The value in brackets refers to the test coverage of that file in the old version of the code.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

👍 Frogbot scanned this pull request and did not find any new security issues.


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant