Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REFACTOR] introducing hyperswitch_interface crates #3535

Closed
Tracked by #3250
Chethan-rao opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3536
Closed
Tracked by #3250

[REFACTOR] introducing hyperswitch_interface crates #3535

Chethan-rao opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3536
Assignees
Labels
C-feature Category: Feature request or enhancement

Comments

@Chethan-rao
Copy link
Contributor

Chethan-rao commented Feb 2, 2024

Create a new crate Hyperswitch-interface containing below modules for now:
secrets_interface: Module used for application config encryption and decryption during startup which will contain its own trait and error types
encryption_interface: Module used for user value encryption and decryption during runtime which will contain its own trait and error types

@Chethan-rao Chethan-rao self-assigned this Feb 2, 2024
@Chethan-rao Chethan-rao added C-feature Category: Feature request or enhancement C-refactor Category: Refactor and removed C-refactor Category: Refactor labels Feb 2, 2024
@Chethan-rao Chethan-rao changed the title Create secrets_interface and encryption_interface crates [REFACTOR] Create secrets_interface and encryption_interface crates Feb 2, 2024
@Chethan-rao Chethan-rao linked a pull request Feb 2, 2024 that will close this issue
15 tasks
@Chethan-rao Chethan-rao changed the title [REFACTOR] Create secrets_interface and encryption_interface crates [REFACTOR] introducing hyperswitch_interface crates Feb 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-feature Category: Feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant