Skip to content

Conversation

XiShanYongYe-Chang
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

ref #6780

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Part of #6780

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. label Sep 25, 2025
@karmada-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from xishanyongye-chang. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @XiShanYongYe-Chang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to enhance the efficiency of the binding controllers by significantly reducing the number of unnecessary watch events that trigger reconciliation. By introducing a custom predicate, the controllers will now only process updates to ResourceBinding and ClusterResourceBinding objects when specific, relevant fields within their Spec have been modified, thereby optimizing performance and decreasing system load.

Highlights

  • Optimized Event Handling: Implemented a new predicate function to filter ResourceBinding and ClusterResourceBinding update events, ensuring reconciliations only occur when significant Spec fields change.
  • Reduced Controller Load: Introduced careBindingSpecChanged function to precisely identify relevant changes in ResourceBindingSpec, preventing unnecessary controller re-syncs for irrelevant field updates.
  • Enhanced Test Coverage: Added comprehensive unit tests for the careBindingSpecChanged function, covering various scenarios of field modifications to ensure its correctness.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 25, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces predicate functions to the binding controllers to filter out unnecessary update events, which is a great optimization to reduce controller load. The new careBindingSpecChanged function correctly identifies most of the relevant fields in ResourceBindingSpec. I've found a critical issue in the cluster_resource_binding_controller and a minor bug in the comparison logic, along with a suggestion for improving maintainability. Overall, this is a valuable improvement.

@XiShanYongYe-Chang
Copy link
Member Author

Given that @rohan-019 has already submitted the PR, I plan to close the current PR at last.

@XiShanYongYe-Chang XiShanYongYe-Chang marked this pull request as draft September 25, 2025 12:34
@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 25, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 25, 2025

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 35.59322% with 38 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 45.74%. Comparing base (70411ab) to head (2ca74fa).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/controllers/binding/binding_controller.go 0.00% 19 Missing ⚠️
...ers/binding/cluster_resource_binding_controller.go 0.00% 19 Missing ⚠️
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6786   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   45.74%   45.74%           
=======================================
  Files         689      689           
  Lines       57161    57231   +70     
=======================================
+ Hits        26149    26183   +34     
- Misses      29383    29421   +38     
+ Partials     1629     1627    -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 45.74% <35.59%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@XiShanYongYe-Chang XiShanYongYe-Chang force-pushed the reduce-unnecessary-watch-events-in-binding-controller branch 3 times, most recently from 8fa7dc8 to 4b8ffec Compare September 26, 2025 03:38
@XiShanYongYe-Chang XiShanYongYe-Chang marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2025 07:36
@karmada-bot karmada-bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 26, 2025
@XiShanYongYe-Chang
Copy link
Member Author

Hi @rohan-019, You can refer to this PR.

@XiShanYongYe-Chang XiShanYongYe-Chang force-pushed the reduce-unnecessary-watch-events-in-binding-controller branch from 4b8ffec to 2ca74fa Compare September 26, 2025 07:59
@RainbowMango
Copy link
Member

Please add some descriptions to this PR.

@XiShanYongYe-Chang
Copy link
Member Author

Please add some descriptions to this PR.

@rohan-019 submitted PR #6784 to address the same subtask, and the PR is almost ready after several rounds of iterations. Let me close the current PR.
/close

@karmada-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@XiShanYongYe-Chang: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Please add some descriptions to this PR.

@rohan-019 submitted PR #6784 to address the same subtask, and the PR is almost ready after several rounds of iterations. Let me close the current PR.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants