Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(service_health): combine legacy kobocat service check into primary TASK-931 #5231

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2024

Conversation

bufke
Copy link
Contributor

@bufke bufke commented Nov 6, 2024

📖 Description

Combine checks in /legacy/service_health/ and /service_health/ while removing /legacy/service_health/

💭 Notes

The /legacy/service_health/ api is from the previously separate kobocat code base. It no longer services a purpose. This removes an internal API request from kpi to itself. This internal API complicated setting Django's ALLOWED_HOSTS to only the actual public domain.

Updated formatting on heavily edited files.

Node test failure appears unrelated.

@bufke bufke added the Back end label Nov 6, 2024
@bufke bufke self-assigned this Nov 6, 2024
@bufke bufke changed the title feat(service_health) Combine kobocat (legacy) service check into primary health check api TASK-931 feat(service_health): combine legacy kobocat service check into primary TASK-931 Nov 6, 2024
@bufke bufke marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2024 16:34
@bufke bufke requested review from jnm and noliveleger as code owners November 6, 2024 16:34
Copy link
Contributor

@noliveleger noliveleger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@noliveleger noliveleger merged commit 5d9ca2d into main Nov 11, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@noliveleger noliveleger deleted the task-931-simplify-service-health branch November 11, 2024 20:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants