Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor server info-handler #974

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 16, 2024
Merged

Refactor server info-handler #974

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 16, 2024

Conversation

rgwozdz
Copy link
Member

@rgwozdz rgwozdz commented Apr 16, 2024

This refactor allows us to use this handler directly in output-geoservices, without the catch-all route module. Part of preliminary work to support editing.

@rgwozdz rgwozdz self-assigned this Apr 16, 2024
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 16, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 6e84950

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report (change vs master)

File Path Statements Branches Functions Lines
packages/featureserver/src/rest-info-route-handler.js 100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
packages/featureserver/src/route.js 85.2 yellow
vs
85.7 yellow
76.5 orange
vs
76.5 orange
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
85.2 yellow
vs
85.7 yellow
packages/featureserver/src/server-info-route-handler.js 100.0 green
vs
98.1 yellowGreen
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
98.1 yellowGreen
packages/featureserver/src/helpers/combine-body-query-params.js 100.0 green
vs
(NA)
100.0 green
vs
(NA)
100.0 green
vs
(NA)
100.0 green
vs
(NA)
packages/featureserver/src/helpers/index.js 100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
packages/featureserver/src/helpers/normalize-input-data.js 100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
packages/featureserver/src/helpers/normalize-request-params.js 100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
packages/featureserver/src/helpers/validate-info-route-params.js 100.0 green
vs
(NA)
100.0 green
vs
(NA)
100.0 green
vs
(NA)
100.0 green
vs
(NA)
packages/output-geoservices/src/index.js 100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green
100.0 green
vs
100.0 green

@rgwozdz rgwozdz merged commit edb5fe3 into next Apr 16, 2024
3 checks passed
@rgwozdz rgwozdz deleted the rf/s-info branch April 16, 2024 21:32
rgwozdz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
* chore: refactor serverInfo
rgwozdz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
* chore: refactor serverInfo
rgwozdz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2024
* chore: refactor serverInfo
rgwozdz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
* chore: refactor serverInfo
rgwozdz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
* chore: refactor serverInfo
rgwozdz added a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2024
* Refactor: use restInfo handler directly in output-geoservice (#967)

* Refactor server info-handler (#974)

* refactor layers-info handler (#975)

* refactor feature server layers-info handler (#976)

* refactor: query handler (#977)

* refactor: generate-renderer and query-related-requests (#997)

* refactor: remove route module (#998)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant