Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 9: Local scope variable shadows member #341

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2025

Conversation

krishnprakash
Copy link
Owner

Potential fix for https://github.com/krishnprakash/codeql/security/code-scanning/9

To fix the problem, we need to rename the local variable type on line 110 to avoid shadowing the member variable type. This will eliminate the confusion and potential errors caused by the shadowing. The best way to fix this is to choose a new, descriptive name for the local variable that does not conflict with any existing member variables.

In this case, we can rename the local variable type to annotatedType, which clearly describes its purpose and avoids any naming conflicts.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

…dows member

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Phileco <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the C# label Mar 11, 2025
@krishnprakash krishnprakash marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2025 09:26
@krishnprakash krishnprakash merged commit a01af8a into main Mar 11, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant