-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
refactor(field): consolidate Goldilocks hybrid into canonical, fix ty… #1172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
diegokingston
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
refactor/rustcraft-fields
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correctness
v.inv().unwrap()without handling potential failures. If the inversion can returnNone(e.g., trying to invert zero), it must be handled or ensured that inputs are non-zero.Security
unwrap: The use ofunwrap()can lead to panics, which might expose information on inputs if invocations fail under specific conditions (e.g., input secrecy concerns).Performance
Goldilocks64HybridFieldand its extensions is noted, but ensure these are no longer relevant. If they aren't actively used, removing them enhances performance by simplifying the code base.Bugs & Errors
unwrap()can panic. If these are in critical paths, they must be replaced with graceful error handling.Code Simplicity
Hybridfields). If the types are capable of being handled generically, consider consolidating instead of removing.Ensure that all necessary test coverage is maintained with the removal of these hybrid benchmarks if these types are still in use elsewhere.