Skip to content

Conversation

@Jakuje
Copy link
Contributor

@Jakuje Jakuje commented Feb 28, 2025

Fixes: #159

@Jakuje
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jakuje commented Feb 28, 2025

as expected, the pkcs11-provder integration test fails ... will dig into that later

@simo5
Copy link
Member

simo5 commented Feb 28, 2025

The change looks good to me, hopefully the pkcs11-provider setup failures are easy to solve.

Copy link
Member

@simo5 simo5 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@simo5 simo5 changed the title objects: Do not return CKR_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE_INVALID for missing attributes objects: Do not return CKR_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE_INVALID for unavailable attributes Mar 3, 2025
@simo5 simo5 merged commit e83eea0 into latchset:main Mar 3, 2025
23 checks passed
@simo5 simo5 added this to the release-1.0 milestone Mar 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Do not return CKR_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE_INVALID for missing CKA_ALLOWED_MECHANISMS

2 participants