[da-vinci] Bug fix for peer discovery in DVC with multi-stores #4291
Annotations
8 errors
|
Publish Test Report:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$694/697426714@59e91212
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738805462137, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738805462137, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$694/697426714@10cb1a5f
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738805462137, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$694/697426714@552df3bb
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738805462137, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738805462137, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.li
|
|
Publish Test Report:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4353)
However, there were exactly 54 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_59f2b6ff98_4946fbc9_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:887)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_59f2b6ff98_4946fbc9_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:644)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:658)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:605)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:667)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1657)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 496406921
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1659)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1575)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 496406921
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1660)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_59f2b6ff98_4946fbc9_v1-1, attempts=3, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738805465458},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 496406921
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1949)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_59f2b6ff98_4946fbc9_v1-1, attempts=3, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738805465458}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:572)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_59f2b6ff98_4946fbc9_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2199)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_59f2b6ff98_4946fbc9_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestP
|
|
Publish Test Report:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)
|
|
Publish Test Report:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
However, there were exactly 108 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
4.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.008756d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.221082d,
1738805618305L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.006332d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.18938199999999997d,
1738805618308L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.006492d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.150811d,
1738805618320L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.004758d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngesti
|
|
Publish Test Report:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$694/697426714@59e91212
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738805462137, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738805462137, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$694/697426714@10cb1a5f
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738805462137, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$694/697426714@552df3bb
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738805462137, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_592de33696_e3ffb019_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738805462137, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.li
|
|
Publish Test Report:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4353)
However, there were exactly 54 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_59f2b6ff98_4946fbc9_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:887)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_59f2b6ff98_4946fbc9_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:644)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:658)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:605)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:667)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1657)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 496406921
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1659)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1575)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 496406921
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1660)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_59f2b6ff98_4946fbc9_v1-1, attempts=3, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738805465458},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 496406921
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1949)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_59f2b6ff98_4946fbc9_v1-1, attempts=3, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738805465458}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:572)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_59f2b6ff98_4946fbc9_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2199)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_59f2b6ff98_4946fbc9_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestP
|
|
Publish Test Report:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)
|
|
Publish Test Report:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
However, there were exactly 108 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
4.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.008756d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.221082d,
1738805618305L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.006332d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.18938199999999997d,
1738805618308L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.006492d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.150811d,
1738805618320L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.004758d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngesti
|
Loading