Skip to content

[server] Validate block-cache config against system memory #4295

[server] Validate block-cache config against system memory

[server] Validate block-cache config against system memory #4295

Triggered via pull request February 6, 2025 17:21
Status Failure
Total duration 13m 10s
Artifacts 19
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Integrations / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
9s
ValidateGradleWrapper
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
0s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

32 errors
InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.testInstanceMeasurement: internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/memory/InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.java#L46
java.lang.AssertionError: Class KafkaKey has a memoryAllocatedPerInstance (29.95896) which is too far from the predictedUsage (40); delta: 0.251; maxAllowedDelta: 0.033. No more attempts left.
InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.testInstanceMeasurement: internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/memory/InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.java#L46
java.lang.AssertionError: Class KafkaKey has a memoryAllocatedPerInstance (29.95896) which is too far from the predictedUsage (40); delta: 0.251; maxAllowedDelta: 0.033. No more attempts left.
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)
Server / UT & CodeCov (8)
Process completed with exit code 1.
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$514/1760261131@6db3bcc5 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862731439, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862731439, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$514/1760261131@7b53edc4 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$514/1760261131@3fad7113 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862731439, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862731439, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862731439, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) However, there were exactly 33 interactions with this mock: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 1.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.002394d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.462514d, 1738862731741L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.06314800000000001d, 1738862731743L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.001163d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.045564d, 1738862731754L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.040966d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.005801d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestio
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$514/1760261131@6db3bcc5 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862731439, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862731439, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$514/1760261131@7b53edc4 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$514/1760261131@3fad7113 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862731439, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862731439, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_5a521af8c7_6ccfadd8_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862731439, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) However, there were exactly 33 interactions with this mock: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 1.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.002394d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.462514d, 1738862731741L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.06314800000000001d, 1738862731743L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.001163d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.045564d, 1738862731754L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.040966d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.005801d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestio
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_63f67b1ffe_665dcad3_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_63f67b1ffe_665dcad3_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_63f67b1ffe_665dcad3_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_63f67b1ffe_665dcad3_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$786/0x00000008007ae040@40417c35 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_63f67b1ffe_665dcad3_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862766008, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_63f67b1ffe_665dcad3_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862766008, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_63f67b1ffe_665dcad3_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$786/0x00000008007ae040@6db6cfc4 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_63f67b1ffe_665dcad3_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862766008, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_63f67b1ffe_665dcad3_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$786/0x00000008007ae040@350dc63b ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_63f67b1ffe_665dcad3_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862766008, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_63f67b1ffe_665dcad3_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862766008, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClas
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[1](true): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 3 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) But was 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629) -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[0](AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8b6fa3e71b_9787028c_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1619) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_8b6fa3e71b_9787028c_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_8b6fa3e71b_9787028c_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8b6fa3e71b_9787028c_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@7fddcf8e ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8b6fa3e71b_9787028c_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@f5fcdf5 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8b6fa3e71b_9787028c_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862942732, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8b6fa3e71b_9787028c_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862942732, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8b6fa3e71b_9787028c_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862942740, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8b6fa3e71b_9787028c_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862942738, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8b6fa3e71b_9787028c_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@1e60c357 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8b6fa3e71b_9787028c_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@2a82a45e ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataServic
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8e73bfccfe_a6ee769e_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1619) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_8e73bfccfe_a6ee769e_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_8e73bfccfe_a6ee769e_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8e73bfccfe_a6ee769e_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@2b07d0ab ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8e73bfccfe_a6ee769e_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@6e6dd54a ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8e73bfccfe_a6ee769e_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862948512, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8e73bfccfe_a6ee769e_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862948512, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8e73bfccfe_a6ee769e_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862948513, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8e73bfccfe_a6ee769e_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@53bac199 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8e73bfccfe_a6ee769e_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738862948513, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8e73bfccfe_a6ee769e_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@310d92cf ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataServi
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_9adcf71770_ea966c5d_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_9adcf71770_ea966c5d_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_9adcf71770_ea966c5d_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_9adcf71770_ea966c5d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@626487fc ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_9adcf71770_ea966c5d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@6954f50c ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_9adcf71770_ea966c5d_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738863001796, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_9adcf71770_ea966c5d_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738863001796, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_9adcf71770_ea966c5d_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738863001797, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_9adcf71770_ea966c5d_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738863001797, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_9adcf71770_ea966c5d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@1001835e ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_9adcf71770_ea966c5d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@6bc11217 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataServi
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a1a1997096_a70d54e4_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_a1a1997096_a70d54e4_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_a1a1997096_a70d54e4_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_a1a1997096_a70d54e4_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@4795a246 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_a1a1997096_a70d54e4_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@6307f0ea ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a1a1997096_a70d54e4_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738863030865, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a1a1997096_a70d54e4_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738863030866, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a1a1997096_a70d54e4_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738863030866, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a1a1997096_a70d54e4_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738863030866, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_a1a1997096_a70d54e4_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@bd00d79 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_a1a1997096_a70d54e4_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$532/0x000000080069c440@54d5bf3f ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataServic
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) However, there were exactly 21 interactions with this mock: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 1.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.010189d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.082996d, 1738862764036L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.07703399999999999d, 1738862764037L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.006853d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.041478d, 1738862764048L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.005571d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.006082d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestio
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L654
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGetToUnreachableClient: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L1010
java.lang.AssertionError: Task java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask@3f14c6ef[Not completed, task = java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter@2c120dc[Wrapped task = com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.meta.RequestBasedMetadata$$Lambda$468/0x00007f7f30536b40@32c3d97e]] rejected from java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor@38eb8745[Terminated, pool size = 0, active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 0] expected [true] but found [false]
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L654
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGetToUnreachableClient: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L1010
java.lang.AssertionError: Task java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask@3f14c6ef[Not completed, task = java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter@2c120dc[Wrapped task = com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.meta.RequestBasedMetadata$$Lambda$468/0x00007f7f30536b40@32c3d97e]] rejected from java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor@38eb8745[Terminated, pool size = 0, active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 0] expected [true] but found [false]
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L664
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L664
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
Process completed with exit code 1.

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size
StaticAnalysis
666 KB
clients-jdk11
2.56 MB
clients-jdk17
2.59 MB
clients-jdk8
2.52 MB
controller-jdk11
1.61 MB
controller-jdk17
1.63 MB
controller-jdk8
1.62 MB
integrations-jdk11
519 KB
integrations-jdk17
524 KB
integrations-jdk8
507 KB
internal-jdk11
3.47 MB
internal-jdk17
3.48 MB
internal-jdk8
3.45 MB
router-jdk11
1.04 MB
router-jdk17
1.03 MB
router-jdk8
1.02 MB
server-jdk11
9.64 MB
server-jdk17
9.16 MB
server-jdk8
7.74 MB