Skip to content

[da-vinci] Bug fix for peer discovery in DVC with multi-stores #4317

[da-vinci] Bug fix for peer discovery in DVC with multi-stores

[da-vinci] Bug fix for peer discovery in DVC with multi-stores #4317

Triggered via pull request February 7, 2025 20:43
Status Success
Total duration 13m 7s
Artifacts 19
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Integrations / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
9s
ValidateGradleWrapper
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
0s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

24 errors
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[1](true): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 3 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) But was 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629) -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$744/2004916549@75d1c0f2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738961359499, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$744/2004916549@3b7909d5 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738961359499, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738961359499, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$744/2004916549@1edc529e ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738961359499, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738961359499, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testOffsetSyncBeforeGracefulShutDown[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: pcs.getLatestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset() for PARTITION_FOO is expected to be zero! expected [0] but found [1]
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[1](true): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 3 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) But was 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629) -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$744/2004916549@75d1c0f2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738961359499, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$744/2004916549@3b7909d5 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738961359499, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738961359499, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$744/2004916549@1edc529e ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738961359499, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_62d5040ffb_37dc1eca_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738961359499, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testOffsetSyncBeforeGracefulShutDown[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: pcs.getLatestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset() for PARTITION_FOO is expected to be zero! expected [0] but found [1]
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError: clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError( <any string>, 1, <Capturing argument> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4353) However, there were exactly 50 interactions with this mock: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_6a8c728626_60f101d5_v1-1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:887) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_6a8c728626_60f101d5_v1-1, true ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:644) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:658) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:605) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:667) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run(); -> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1657) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged( Mock for Store, hashCode: 481373781 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1659) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1575) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 481373781 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1660) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_6a8c728626_60f101d5_v1-1, attempts=1, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738961326679}, Mock for Store, hashCode: 481373781 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1949) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_6a8c728626_60f101d5_v1-1, attempts=1, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738961326679} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:572) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_6a8c728626_60f101d5_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2199) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_6a8c728626_60f101d5_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testOffsetSyncBeforeGracefulShutDown[0](AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: pcs.getLatestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset() for PARTITION_FOO is expected to be zero! expected [0] but found [2]
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError: clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError( <any string>, 1, <Capturing argument> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4353) However, there were exactly 50 interactions with this mock: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_6a8c728626_60f101d5_v1-1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:887) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_6a8c728626_60f101d5_v1-1, true ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:644) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:658) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:605) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:667) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run(); -> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1657) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged( Mock for Store, hashCode: 481373781 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1659) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1575) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 481373781 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1660) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_6a8c728626_60f101d5_v1-1, attempts=1, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738961326679}, Mock for Store, hashCode: 481373781 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1949) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_6a8c728626_60f101d5_v1-1, attempts=1, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738961326679} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:572) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_6a8c728626_60f101d5_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2199) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_6a8c728626_60f101d5_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testOffsetSyncBeforeGracefulShutDown[0](AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: pcs.getLatestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset() for PARTITION_FOO is expected to be zero! expected [0] but found [2]
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError: clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError( <any string>, 1, <Capturing argument> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4353) However, there were exactly 50 interactions with this mock: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_5f01375fcc_794521c6_v1-1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:887) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_5f01375fcc_794521c6_v1-1, true ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:644) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:658) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:605) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:667) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run(); -> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1657) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged( Mock for Store, hashCode: 344696997 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1659) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1575) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 344696997 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1660) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5f01375fcc_794521c6_v1-1, attempts=1, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738961309289}, Mock for Store, hashCode: 344696997 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1949) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5f01375fcc_794521c6_v1-1, attempts=1, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738961309289} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:572) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5f01375fcc_794521c6_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2199) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5f01375fcc_794521c6_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError: clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError( <any string>, 1, <Capturing argument> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4353) However, there were exactly 50 interactions with this mock: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_5f01375fcc_794521c6_v1-1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:887) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_5f01375fcc_794521c6_v1-1, true ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:644) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:658) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:605) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:667) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run(); -> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1657) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged( Mock for Store, hashCode: 344696997 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1659) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1575) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 344696997 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1660) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5f01375fcc_794521c6_v1-1, attempts=1, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738961309289}, Mock for Store, hashCode: 344696997 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1949) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5f01375fcc_794521c6_v1-1, attempts=1, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738961309289} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:572) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5f01375fcc_794521c6_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2199) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5f01375fcc_794521c6_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L654
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGetToUnreachableClient: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L1021
java.lang.AssertionError: Cannot invoke "com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.StatsAvroGenericStoreClient.batchGet(com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.BatchGetRequestContext, java.util.Set)" because "this.statsAvroGenericStoreClient" is null expected [true] but found [false]
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L654
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGetToUnreachableClient: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L1021
java.lang.AssertionError: Cannot invoke "com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.StatsAvroGenericStoreClient.batchGet(com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.BatchGetRequestContext, java.util.Set)" because "this.statsAvroGenericStoreClient" is null expected [true] but found [false]
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L1
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L1
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size
StaticAnalysis
666 KB
clients-jdk11
2.59 MB
clients-jdk17
2.61 MB
clients-jdk8
2.54 MB
controller-jdk11
1.63 MB
controller-jdk17
1.63 MB
controller-jdk8
1.63 MB
integrations-jdk11
529 KB
integrations-jdk17
533 KB
integrations-jdk8
518 KB
internal-jdk11
3.48 MB
internal-jdk17
3.49 MB
internal-jdk8
3.46 MB
router-jdk11
1.04 MB
router-jdk17
1.03 MB
router-jdk8
1.03 MB
server-jdk11
9.22 MB
server-jdk17
8.95 MB
server-jdk8
9.31 MB