Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
workflows: Rewrite build-ci-container to work on larger runners #117353
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
workflows: Rewrite build-ci-container to work on larger runners #117353
Changes from 13 commits
eac6c1b
62fac26
7f1cd6d
f0c3050
db0861f
0c76987
fe77a87
63e0fc6
7985506
5ed7ba6
24b33e5
7ddb314
379c49d
966fd98
00f4dcd
1f3a36f
9eaf5d3
8710b53
a941073
8660cae
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe add a comment on why the
rm -rf ./build
is here? I believe it was originally to avoid out of disk space errors. Assuming the depot runners have enough disk, it would still be useful as it probably reduces checkpointing time.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm inclined to drop it. I think this is a common pattern when doing something on the final image, but since this is just a builder image, I'm not sure if it makes sense to do. I don't have a strong opinion though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems reasonable enough to me.
This file was deleted.
This file was deleted.