Skip to content

Defer switch exhaustiveness checks #35000

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 9, 2019
Merged

Conversation

ahejlsberg
Copy link
Member

Fixes the issue reported here: #34840 (comment).

@ahejlsberg ahejlsberg requested a review from weswigham November 8, 2019 19:22
@ahejlsberg ahejlsberg added this to the TypeScript 3.8.0 milestone Nov 8, 2019
@ahejlsberg
Copy link
Member Author

@RyanCavanaugh @weswigham We might consider cherry picking this for 3.7.3.

@weswigham
Copy link
Member

@typescript-bot test this
@typescript-bot user test this
@typescript-bot run dt

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Nov 8, 2019

Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the extended test suite on this PR at be5d09e. You can monitor the build here. It should now contribute to this PR's status checks.

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Nov 8, 2019

Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at be5d09e. You can monitor the build here. It should now contribute to this PR's status checks.

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Nov 8, 2019

Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the parallelized community code test suite on this PR at be5d09e. You can monitor the build here. It should now contribute to this PR's status checks.

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

The user suite test run you requested has finished and failed. I've opened a PR with the baseline diff from master.

Copy link
Member

@weswigham weswigham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

User suite diff is same as master and DT failures look unrelated, so seems good.

@RyanCavanaugh
Copy link
Member

@ahejlsberg does this also fix #34960?

@weswigham
Copy link
Member

Based on this exchange in the other PR, I'm guessing yes?

@ahejlsberg
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, this fixes #34960.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants