-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Python: Feature new memory stores and collections (#7614)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> This PR adds new vector store and vector store record collections as well as implementations for: - Azure AI Search - Redis - Qdrant - Volatile (in-memory) It also adds samples, tests, and unit-tests for these. Next it adds the vector store record fields, definition and decorator, with tests and samples. All marked experimental. Existing Redis, Azure AI Search, Qdrant and Volatile will be marked as deprecated in the future, once the new collections are feature complete. ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄
- Loading branch information
1 parent
07f94f2
commit 1356d5f
Showing
63 changed files
with
6,359 additions
and
282 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@ | ||
# Copyright (c) Microsoft. All rights reserved. | ||
|
||
from dataclasses import dataclass, field | ||
from typing import Annotated, Any | ||
from uuid import uuid4 | ||
|
||
from pandas import DataFrame | ||
from pydantic import Field | ||
|
||
from semantic_kernel.data.vector_store_model_decorator import vectorstoremodel | ||
from semantic_kernel.data.vector_store_model_definition import VectorStoreRecordDefinition | ||
from semantic_kernel.data.vector_store_record_fields import ( | ||
VectorStoreRecordDataField, | ||
VectorStoreRecordKeyField, | ||
VectorStoreRecordVectorField, | ||
) | ||
from semantic_kernel.kernel_pydantic import KernelBaseModel | ||
|
||
# This concept shows the different ways you can create a vector store data model | ||
# using dataclasses, Pydantic, and Python classes. | ||
# As well as using types like Pandas Dataframes. | ||
|
||
# There are a number of universal things about these data models: | ||
# they must specify the type of field through the annotation (or the definition). | ||
# there must be at least one field of type VectorStoreRecordKeyField. | ||
# If you set the embedding_property_name in the VectorStoreRecordDataField, that field must exist and be a vector field. | ||
# A unannotated field is allowed but must have a default value. | ||
|
||
# The purpose of these models is to be what you pass to and get back from a vector store. | ||
# There maybe limitations to data types that the vector store can handle, | ||
# so not every store will be able to handle completely the same model. | ||
# for instance, some stores only allow a string as the keyfield, while others allow str and int, | ||
# so defining the key with a int, might make some stores unusable. | ||
|
||
# The decorator takes the class and pulls out the fields and annotations to create a definition, | ||
# of type VectorStoreRecordDefinition. | ||
# This definition is used for the vector store to know how to handle the data model. | ||
|
||
# You can also create the definition yourself, and pass it to the vector stores together with a standard type, | ||
# like a dict or list. | ||
# Or you can use the definition in container mode with something like a Pandas Dataframe. | ||
|
||
|
||
# Data model using built-in Python dataclasses | ||
@vectorstoremodel | ||
@dataclass | ||
class DataModelDataclass: | ||
vector: Annotated[list[float], VectorStoreRecordVectorField] | ||
key: Annotated[str, VectorStoreRecordKeyField()] = field(default_factory=lambda: str(uuid4())) | ||
content: Annotated[str, VectorStoreRecordDataField(has_embedding=True, embedding_property_name="vector")] = ( | ||
"content1" | ||
) | ||
other: str | None = None | ||
|
||
|
||
# Data model using Pydantic BaseModels | ||
@vectorstoremodel | ||
class DataModelPydantic(KernelBaseModel): | ||
vector: Annotated[list[float], VectorStoreRecordVectorField] | ||
key: Annotated[str, VectorStoreRecordKeyField()] = Field(default_factory=lambda: str(uuid4())) | ||
content: Annotated[str, VectorStoreRecordDataField(has_embedding=True, embedding_property_name="vector")] = ( | ||
"content1" | ||
) | ||
other: str | None = None | ||
|
||
|
||
# Data model using Pydantic BaseModels with mixed annotations (from pydantic and SK) | ||
@vectorstoremodel | ||
class DataModelPydanticComplex(KernelBaseModel): | ||
vector: Annotated[list[float], VectorStoreRecordVectorField] | ||
key: Annotated[str, Field(default_factory=lambda: str(uuid4())), VectorStoreRecordKeyField()] | ||
content: Annotated[str, VectorStoreRecordDataField(has_embedding=True, embedding_property_name="vector")] = ( | ||
"content1" | ||
) | ||
other: str | None = None | ||
|
||
|
||
# Data model using Python classes | ||
# This one includes a custom serialize and deserialize method | ||
@vectorstoremodel | ||
class DataModelPython: | ||
def __init__( | ||
self, | ||
vector: Annotated[list[float], VectorStoreRecordVectorField], | ||
key: Annotated[str, VectorStoreRecordKeyField] = None, | ||
content: Annotated[ | ||
str, VectorStoreRecordDataField(has_embedding=True, embedding_property_name="vector") | ||
] = "content1", | ||
other: str | None = None, | ||
): | ||
self.vector = vector | ||
self.other = other | ||
self.key = key or str(uuid4()) | ||
self.content = content | ||
|
||
def __str__(self) -> str: | ||
return f"DataModelPython(vector={self.vector}, key={self.key}, content={self.content}, other={self.other})" | ||
|
||
def serialize(self) -> dict[str, Any]: | ||
return { | ||
"vector": self.vector, | ||
"key": self.key, | ||
"content": self.content, | ||
} | ||
|
||
@classmethod | ||
def deserialize(cls, obj: dict[str, Any]) -> "DataModelDataclass": | ||
return cls( | ||
vector=obj["vector"], | ||
key=obj["key"], | ||
content=obj["content"], | ||
) | ||
|
||
|
||
# Data model definition for use with Pandas | ||
# note the container mode flag, which makes sure that records that are returned are in a container | ||
# even when requesting a batch of records. | ||
# There is also a to_dict and from_dict method, which are used to convert the data model to and from a dict, | ||
# these should be specific to the type used, if using dict as type then these can be left off. | ||
data_model_definition_pandas = VectorStoreRecordDefinition( | ||
fields={ | ||
"vector": VectorStoreRecordVectorField(property_type="list[float]"), | ||
"key": VectorStoreRecordKeyField(property_type="str"), | ||
"content": VectorStoreRecordDataField( | ||
property_type="str", has_embedding=True, embedding_property_name="vector" | ||
), | ||
}, | ||
container_mode=True, | ||
to_dict=lambda record, **_: record.to_dict(orient="records"), | ||
from_dict=lambda records, **_: DataFrame(records), | ||
) | ||
|
||
|
||
if __name__ == "__main__": | ||
data_item1 = DataModelDataclass(content="Hello, world!", vector=[1.0, 2.0, 3.0], other=None) | ||
data_item2 = DataModelPydantic(content="Hello, world!", vector=[1.0, 2.0, 3.0], other=None) | ||
data_item3 = DataModelPydanticComplex(content="Hello, world!", vector=[1.0, 2.0, 3.0], other=None) | ||
data_item4 = DataModelPython(content="Hello, world!", vector=[1.0, 2.0, 3.0], other=None) | ||
print("Example records:") | ||
print(f"DataClass:\n {data_item1}", end="\n\n") | ||
print(f"Pydantic:\n {data_item2}", end="\n\n") | ||
print(f"Pydantic with annotations:\n {data_item3}", end="\n\n") | ||
print(f"Python:\n {data_item4}", end="\n\n") | ||
|
||
print("Item definitions:") | ||
print(f"DataClass:\n {data_item1.__kernel_vectorstoremodel_definition__}", end="\n\n") | ||
print(f"Pydantic:\n {data_item2.__kernel_vectorstoremodel_definition__}", end="\n\n") | ||
print(f"Pydantic with annotations:\n {data_item3.__kernel_vectorstoremodel_definition__}", end="\n\n") | ||
print(f"Python:\n {data_item4.__kernel_vectorstoremodel_definition__}", end="\n\n") | ||
print(f"Definition for use with Pandas:\n {data_model_definition_pandas}", end="\n\n") | ||
if ( | ||
data_item1.__kernel_vectorstoremodel_definition__.fields | ||
== data_item2.__kernel_vectorstoremodel_definition__.fields | ||
== data_item3.__kernel_vectorstoremodel_definition__.fields | ||
== data_item4.__kernel_vectorstoremodel_definition__.fields | ||
== data_model_definition_pandas.fields | ||
): | ||
print("All data models are the same") | ||
else: | ||
print("Data models are not the same") |
Oops, something went wrong.