docs: update spec.md to ensure consistent terminology and clarity

[aftersnow]

Updated the specification for model artifacts to ensure consistent terminology and clarity.

Description

Changes include specifying "model weights files" instead of "model weight file" and refining descriptions for various media types to enhance understanding.

Related Issue

None

Motivation and Context

To ensure consistent terminology and clarity.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @aftersnow, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the clarity and consistency of the spec.md documentation. The changes primarily involve standardizing terminology related to model artifacts, refining the descriptions of various media types, and making minor grammatical and stylistic improvements to ensure the specification is precise and easy to understand for all readers.

Highlights

• Terminology Consistency: Standardized the term "model weight file" to "model weights file" throughout the specification for improved clarity.
• Description Refinements: Enhanced the descriptions for various media types, such as clarifying "config of the model weights" to "configuration file(s) of the model weights" and using "contains" instead of "includes" for tar archives.
• Grammar and RFC2119 Compliance: Corrected a grammatical error from "a AI/ML model" to "an AI/ML model" and updated the use of keywords like "should" to "SHOULD" to align with RFC2119 for clearer requirement definitions.
• Minor Wording Improvements: Adjusted phrasing such as "implementation" to "implementations" and "owner/group id" to "owner/group ID" for better readability and precision.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the spec.md document to improve consistency and clarity in terminology. Key changes include standardizing on "model weights file(s)", using "contains" instead of "includes" for archive contents, clarifying descriptions for configuration and dataset files, and using RFC 2119 keywords like SHOULD for recommendations. The changes are well-motivated and improve the specification's quality. I have one suggestion to further improve consistency.

[gaius-qi]

LGTM