Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve error reporting for subject transforms in streams #5617

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

jnmoyne
Copy link
Contributor

@jnmoyne jnmoyne commented Jul 4, 2024

Improve error reporting for bad subject mapping transform sources and destinations.

Add checking of subject transforms in stream configuration for mirroring subject transform and stream subject transform.

Add missing JS API Errors:
JSMirrorInvalidTransformDestination
JSStreamTransformInvalidSource
JSStreamTransformInvalidDestination

… destinations.

Add checking of subject transforms in stream configuration for mirroring subject transform and stream subject transform.

Add missing JS API Errors.

Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Moyne <[email protected]>
@jnmoyne jnmoyne requested a review from a team as a code owner July 4, 2024 21:32
Copy link
Member

@derekcollison derekcollison left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@derekcollison derekcollison merged commit 5a0debd into main Jul 22, 2024
3 checks passed
@derekcollison derekcollison deleted the jnm/stream_config_check_transforms_improve branch July 22, 2024 15:51
@wallyqs wallyqs changed the title Improve error reporting for subject transforms in streams [v2.11] Improve error reporting for subject transforms in streams Jan 8, 2025
@wallyqs wallyqs changed the title [v2.11] Improve error reporting for subject transforms in streams Improve error reporting for subject transforms in streams Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants