Skip to content

Conversation

@eval-exec
Copy link
Collaborator

@eval-exec eval-exec commented Sep 14, 2025

What problem does this PR solve?

For rich-indexer, we don't really need to insert uncle block related info into database. This PR remove the related logic.

Related changes

  • Remove the uncle block logic for rich-indexer

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code ci-runs-only: [ quick_checks,linters ]

Side effects

  • None

Release note

Title Only: Include only the PR title in the release note.

@eval-exec eval-exec requested a review from a team as a code owner September 14, 2025 09:10
@eval-exec eval-exec requested review from doitian and removed request for a team September 14, 2025 09:10
@eval-exec eval-exec force-pushed the exec/rich-indexer-should-not-have-uncle branch from c31eaba to 038d935 Compare September 14, 2025 09:58
@eval-exec eval-exec force-pushed the exec/rich-indexer-should-not-have-uncle branch from 038d935 to 9ba3b8c Compare September 14, 2025 11:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants