You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I propose swapping out our denv1 to denv4 level datasets to the Verity Hill lineage system dataset. This has the added benefit of solving the following issues:
A remaining question is if we want to create two levels (metadata fields) of coloring for "major" and "minor" lineage? Perhaps named "Major lineage" and "Minor lineage"?
Context
Link to slack thread for context.
Description
Since we added the frequency panel (which can depict frequency of clades among other things) on January 4, 2025, I circled back to looking at dengue sub-serotype lineages.
A new dengue community dataset based on Verity Hill et al, 2024 was added to Nextclade community dataset after substantial PR review from the Nextclade team on August 30, 2024. This community dataset seems suitable for sub-serotype lineage calling and includes individual datasets for
denv1
,denv2
,denv3
anddenv4
and "lineage nomenclature seems to be part of a collaborative effort involving various research groups from different countries".I propose swapping out our
denv1
todenv4
level datasets to the Verity Hill lineage system dataset. This has the added benefit of solving the following issues:Examples
Possible solution
Copied from slack thread:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: