Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rating widget : modify selectable list of artifacts #92

Open
celprov opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Rating widget : modify selectable list of artifacts #92

celprov opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@celprov
Copy link
Collaborator

celprov commented Jul 19, 2022

Based on my observations in the bad quality dataset, I would like to propose some modifications of the list of artifacts that can be selected.

  • Add a signal drop-out artifact
  • Separate head motion artifact into distorting ripples, heavily structure carpet plot and high motion peaks
  • Add peaks in slice-wise noise average on background artifact
  • Add heavy structure in the background noise

cc @oesteban

@celprov celprov self-assigned this Jul 19, 2022
@celprov celprov removed their assignment Aug 12, 2022
@celprov
Copy link
Collaborator Author

celprov commented Aug 12, 2022

  • I guess as long as the signal drop-out cuts just a small part of the brain, it is a consequence of susceptibility distortion that can be corrected in susceptibility distortion correction. However in a dataset gathering bad examples, I could witness some extreme signal drop-out cutting a significant part of the brain. Hence my interest to add it to the artifact list.
  • Head motion is manifesting in several ways, so I think distinguishing those could help retrieve more precise description of the reason of exclusion, when coming back to the dataset later. Furthermore, it could help us find more easily examples of specific artifacts we and others want to showcase or retrieve.
  • Peaks in slice-wise noise average may be more a consequence of an artifact that an artifact in itself I reckon.
  • Structure in the background may be too vague.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants