Use sa_sigaction instead of sa_union.__su_sigaction for AIX #2614
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SteveLauC
force-pushed
the
use-sigaction
branch
from
467d1fd to
142a52c
Compare
|
I took the liberty to rebase your branch to pull #2618 in:) |
Thank you so much, @SteveLauC! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do
Change to use
sa_sigactioninstead ofsa_union.__su_sigaction, now that thelibccrate implementation for AIX definessa_sigactionas a direct member ofstruct sigaction, aligning it with implementations on other similar platforms. (rust-lang/libc#4250).Checklist:
CONTRIBUTING.md