Skip to content

[Backport v3.0-branch] NCSDK-32650: Revert incompatible memory changes #2737

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

tomchy
Copy link
Contributor

@tomchy tomchy commented Apr 9, 2025

Due to compatibility reasons, we should either revert those or provide a clear and tested way to migrate between the v2.9.0-nRF54H20-1 and v3.0.0.

@tomchy tomchy changed the title Backport 21408 to v3.0 branch NCSDK-32650: Revert incompatible memory changes Apr 9, 2025
@tomchy tomchy changed the title NCSDK-32650: Revert incompatible memory changes [Backport v3.0-branch] NCSDK-32650: Revert incompatible memory changes Apr 9, 2025
@tomchy tomchy added this to the ncs-3.0.0 milestone Apr 9, 2025
@nordic-segl
Copy link
Contributor

FYI - compliance fails (as if PR in the upstream was merged in mean time. Thus, this PR is no longer [from list] -> [from tree])

tomchy added 2 commits April 9, 2025 12:05
…lue."

This reverts commit 1e69738.

Ref: NCSDK-32650

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Chyrowicz <[email protected]>

This reverts commit 1e69738
(cherry picked from commit 062e6e1)
This reverts commit a53cb73.

Ref: NCSDK-32650

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Chyrowicz <[email protected]>

This reverts commit a53cb73.
(cherry picked from commit db34319)
@tomchy tomchy force-pushed the backport-21408-to-v3.0-branch branch from 330af46 to 8d9815e Compare April 9, 2025 10:06
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Apr 9, 2025

@bjarki-andreasen bjarki-andreasen merged commit 7e1daf0 into nrfconnect:v4.0.99-ncs1-branch Apr 10, 2025
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants