Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get rid of the old goofball maxcost computation. #1456

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2023

Conversation

linas
Copy link
Member

@linas linas commented Feb 25, 2023

It was confusing, broken, and prevented good parses from happening. See #1450 #1449 and #783 and #1453

It was confusing, broken, and prevented good parses from happening.
See opencog#1450 opencog#1449 and opencog#783 and opencog#1453
@linas linas merged commit c5d714d into opencog:master Feb 25, 2023
@linas linas deleted the no-more-maxcost branch February 25, 2023 01:54
linas added a commit to linas/link-grammar that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2023
The pull req opencog#1456 broke the existing russian dict.
This fixes it.  Seems that a cost cutoff of 3.1 is too low,
as it rejects many good linkages that come from
[[FOO]] & [[BAR]] disjuncts. a cutoff of 4.1 allows these,
while rejecting the cost-6 linkages that ruin corpus-basic.

As of now, I get 45 errors in ru/corpus-basic.batch which is
two less than the 47 that I got, before merging opencog#1450
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant