Skip to content

8355635: Do not collect C strings in C2 scratch buffer #24893

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vnkozlov
Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov commented Apr 26, 2025

JDK-8349479 added call to code_string() for Halt node mach node.
I am observing several more creation and clearing C strings collections during C2 compilation:
[17.405s][debug][codestrings] Clear 2 asm-remarks.
[17.405s][debug][codestrings] Clear 1 dbg-string.

Most are coming from temporary scratch buffer C2 uses for code size calculation. I suggest to not collect strings in this buffer.

Note, CodeSection::set_scratch_emit() is only called from PhaseOutput::scratch_emit_size() for scratch buffer.

I verified with -XX:CompileCommand=print,<classpath>::<method> that hsdis output is the same.

Running on linux-x64 with fastdebug VM:

before:
$  java -XX:-TieredCompilation -Xlog:codestrings=debug com.sun.tools.javac.Main HelloWorld.java | grep codestrings |wc
   1644    6576   80618

after again:
$  java -XX:-TieredCompilation -Xlog:codestrings=debug com.sun.tools.javac.Main HelloWorld.java | grep codestrings |wc
      0       0       0

It is more dramatic with -Xcomp we use for testing:

Before
$  java -XX:-TieredCompilation -Xcomp -Xlog:codestrings=debug com.sun.tools.javac.Main HelloWorld.java | grep codestrings |wc
  70924  283696 3533261

After fix
$  java -XX:-TieredCompilation -Xcomp -Xlog:codestrings=debug com.sun.tools.javac.Main HelloWorld.java | grep codestrings |wc
      0       0       0

I was curious why it is 0 - we do deoptimize nmethod. But with big default CodeCache GC does not collect them.
Reducing CodeCache to 8Mb shows deallocation:

$ java -XX:-TieredCompilation -Xcomp -Xlog:codestrings=debug -Xlog:codecache=debug -XX:+PrintCodeCache -XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=8M com.sun.tools.javac.Main HelloWorld.java
...
[40.196s][debug][codestrings] Clear 42 asm-remarks.
[40.196s][debug][codestrings] Clear 1 dbg-string.
[40.196s][debug][codecache  ] *flushing  nmethod 5811/0x00007f71d74b7188. Live blobs:3370/Free CodeCache:2953Kb

Tested tier1-5, Xcomp,comp-stress.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8355635: Do not collect C strings in C2 scratch buffer (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24893/head:pull/24893
$ git checkout pull/24893

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24893
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24893/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24893

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24893

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24893.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 26, 2025

👋 Welcome back kvn! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 26, 2025

@vnkozlov This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8355635: Do not collect C strings in C2 scratch buffer

Reviewed-by: jrose, thartmann, shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 13 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 26, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 26, 2025

@vnkozlov The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 26, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@rose00 rose00 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, the zero was puzzling to me too; looked like evidence that we killed all the strings, not just the ones in the scratch assembly. But your extra demonstration shows that we collect the strings we want for the non-scratch assemblies.

Good change.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 26, 2025
@vnkozlov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you, @rose00

Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch! The fix looks good to me.

@vnkozlov
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 28, 2025

Going to push as commit 3eaec04.
Since your change was applied there have been 17 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 28, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 28, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 28, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 28, 2025

@vnkozlov Pushed as commit 3eaec04.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@vnkozlov vnkozlov deleted the 8355635 branch April 29, 2025 01:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants